These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15309954)

  • 21. Accuracy of predicting weight and percentage of beef carcass retail product using ultrasound and live animal measures.
    Greiner SP; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Feb; 81(2):466-73. PubMed ID: 12643491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of wholesale lamb marketing options and merchandising styles on retail yield and fabrication time.
    Lorenzen CL; Martin AM; Griffin DB; Dockerty TR; Walter JP; Johnson HK; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Jan; 75(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9027541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Technical note: the United States Department of Agriculture beef yield grade equation requires modification to reflect the current longissimus muscle area to hot carcass weight relationship.
    Lawrence TE; Farrow RL; Zollinger BL; Spivey KS
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jun; 86(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 18310492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimates of subprimal yields from beef carcasses as affected by USDA grades, subcutaneous fat trim level, and carcass sex class and type.
    Griffin DB; Savell JW; Morgan JB; Garrett RP; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2411-30. PubMed ID: 1506304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gluteus medius and rump fat depths as additional live animal ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses.
    Realini CE; Williams RE; Pringle TD; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jun; 79(6):1378-85. PubMed ID: 11424672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of application of USDA beef quality and yield grades using the traditional system and the proposed seven-grade yield grade system.
    Kerth CR; Miller MF; Wise JW; Lansdell JL; Ramsey CB
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Jan; 77(1):116-9. PubMed ID: 10064034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of electronic technology to assess lamb carcass composition.
    Berg EP; Neary MK; Forrest JC; Thomas DL; Kauffman RG
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Sep; 75(9):2433-44. PubMed ID: 9303462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Electromagnetic scanning of pork carcasses in an on-line industrial configuration.
    Berg EP; Forrest JC; Fisher JE
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2642-52. PubMed ID: 7883623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Opportunities to improve the accuracy of the United States Department of Agriculture beef yield grade equation through precision agriculture.
    Jaborek JR; Relling AE; Fluharty FL; Moeller SJ; Zerby HN
    Transl Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 4(2):txaa033. PubMed ID: 32705031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The ability of video image analysis to predict lean meat yield and EUROP score of lamb carcasses.
    Einarsson E; Eythórsdóttir E; Smith CR; Jónmundsson JV
    Animal; 2014 Jul; 8(7):1170-7. PubMed ID: 24807642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Yield grade and carcass weight effects on the cutability of lamb carcasses fabricated into innovative style subprimals.
    Garrett RP; Savell JW; Cross HR; Johnson HK
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1829-39. PubMed ID: 1634407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of an advanced automated ultrasonic scanner (AutoFom III) and a handheld optical probe (Destron PG-100) to determine lean yield in pork carcasses.
    Dorleku JB; Wormsbecher L; Christensen M; Campbell CP; Mandell IB; Bohrer BM
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36807699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of breed type and accelerated fat removal on subprimal yields and carcass values.
    Miller MF; Ramsey CB; Claborn SW; Wu CK
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Apr; 73(4):1055-63. PubMed ID: 7628948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predicting the yield and composition of mature cow carcasses.
    Johnson DD; Rogers AL
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Jul; 75(7):1831-6. PubMed ID: 9222839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Benchmarking carcass characteristics and muscles from commercially identified beef and dairy cull cow carcasses for Warner-Bratzler shear force and sensory attributes.
    Stelzleni AM; Patten LE; Johnson DD; Calkins CR; Gwartney BL
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2631-8. PubMed ID: 17565055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. National Beef Quality Audit-2011: In-plant survey of targeted carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, value, and marketing of fed steers and heifers.
    Moore MC; Gray GD; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Savell JW; Raines CR; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Tatum JD; Igo JL; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Lawrence TE; Delmore RJ; Christensen LM; Shackelford SD; King DA; Wheeler TL; Meadows LR; O'Connor ME
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):5143-51. PubMed ID: 22952369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting red meat yields in carcasses from beef-type and calf-fed Holstein steers using the United States Department of Agriculture calculated yield grade.
    Lawrence TE; Elam NA; Miller MF; Brooks JC; Hilton GG; VanOverbeke DL; McKeith FK; Killefer J; Montgomery TH; Allen DM; Griffin DB; Delmore RJ; Nichols WT; Streeter MN; Yates DA; Hutcheson JP
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jun; 88(6):2139-43. PubMed ID: 20190173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Coupling of image analysis and tenderness classification to simultaneously evaluate carcass cutability, longissimus area, subprimal cut weights, and tenderness of beef.
    Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2631-40. PubMed ID: 9814904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of hot-fat trimming on factors associated with the subprimal yield of beef carcasses.
    Ahmed PO; Miller MF; Shackelford SD; Johnson LP; Williams SE; McCann MA; Reagan JO
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Feb; 70(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 1548206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predicting beef carcass cutability.
    Shackelford SD; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Feb; 73(2):406-13. PubMed ID: 7601772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.