These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15310576)
1. Stability of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: biomechanical testing of various surgical techniques in a cadaveric model. Deshmukh AV; Wilson DR; Zilberfarb JL; Perlmutter GS Am J Sports Med; 2004 Sep; 32(6):1492-8. PubMed ID: 15310576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and a biomechanical study of a triple endobutton technique. Li Q; Hsueh PL; Chen YF Medicine (Baltimore); 2014 Dec; 93(28):e193. PubMed ID: 25526435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Mazzocca AD; Santangelo SA; Johnson ST; Rios CG; Dumonski ML; Arciero RA Am J Sports Med; 2006 Feb; 34(2):236-46. PubMed ID: 16282577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repairs for acromioclavicular joint instability: suture button systems without biological augmentation. Beitzel K; Obopilwe E; Chowaniec DM; Niver GE; Nowak MD; Hanypsiak BT; Guerra JJ; Arciero RA; Mazzocca AD Am J Sports Med; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2218-25. PubMed ID: 21841067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of coracoclavicular reconstructive techniques. Thomas K; Litsky A; Jones G; Bishop JY Am J Sports Med; 2011 Apr; 39(4):804-10. PubMed ID: 21257841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of a modified Weaver-Dunn and a free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex. Michlitsch MG; Adamson GJ; Pink M; Estess A; Shankwiler JA; Lee TQ Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1196-203. PubMed ID: 20351202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Review of Weaver and Dunn on treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation. Verstift DE; Somford MP; van Deurzen DFP; van den Bekerom MPJ J ISAKOS; 2021 Mar; 6(2):116-119. PubMed ID: 33832985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Semitendinosus tendon graft versus a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in chronic cases: a prospective comparative study. Tauber M; Gordon K; Koller H; Fox M; Resch H Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 18818433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical properties of repairs for dislocated AC joints using suture button systems with integrated tendon augmentation. Beitzel K; Obopilwe E; Chowaniec DM; Nowak MD; Hanypsiak BT; Guerra JJ; Arciero RA; Mazzocca AD Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2012 Oct; 20(10):1931-8. PubMed ID: 22210515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a comparative biomechanical study of the palmaris-longus tendon graft reconstruction with other augmentative methods in cadaveric models. Luis GE; Yong CK; Singh DA; Sengupta S; Choon DS J Orthop Surg Res; 2007 Nov; 2():22. PubMed ID: 18042292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint. Grutter PW; Petersen SA Am J Sports Med; 2005 Nov; 33(11):1723-8. PubMed ID: 16093536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of the acromioclavicular capsular ligaments and reconstruction with an intramedullary free tissue graft. Freedman JA; Adamson GJ; Bui C; Lee TQ Am J Sports Med; 2010 May; 38(5):958-64. PubMed ID: 20139471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. TightRope versus fiber mesh tape augmentation of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Zooker CC; Parks BG; White KL; Hinton RY Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1204-8. PubMed ID: 20392969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic and Extra-Anatomic Reconstruction Techniques Using Local Grafts for Chronic Instability of the Acromioclavicular Joint. Le Hanneur M; Thoreson A; Delgrande D; Lafosse T; Werthel JD; Hardy P; Elhassan B Am J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 46(8):1927-1935. PubMed ID: 29746150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary Stability of an Acromioclavicular Joint Repair Is Affected by the Type of Additional Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Capsule. Dyrna F; Imhoff FB; Haller B; Braun S; Obopilwe E; Apostolakos JM; Morikawa D; Imhoff AB; Mazzocca AD; Beitzel K Am J Sports Med; 2018 Dec; 46(14):3471-3479. PubMed ID: 30419178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanics of coracoacromial ligament transfer augmentation for acromioclavicular joint injuries. Wilson DR; Moses JM; Zilberfarb JL; Hayes WC J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):615-9. PubMed ID: 15652562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of acromioclavicular joint reconstructions using coracoclavicular tendon grafts with and without coracoacromial ligament transfer. Clevenger T; Vance RE; Bachus KN; Burks RT; Tashjian RZ Arthroscopy; 2011 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 20950988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of distal clavicle excision on in situ graft forces in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Kowalsky MS; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo KF; McHugh MP; Nicholas SJ; Lee SJ Am J Sports Med; 2010 Nov; 38(11):2313-9. PubMed ID: 20699427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment of complete acromioclavicular separations with a modified Weaver and Dunn technique. Payvandi S; Jeong J; Seitz WH Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg; 2008 Mar; 12(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18388757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]