231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15311287)
21. The opinion of Brazilian women regarding vaginal labor and cesarean section.
Osis MJD; Pádua KS; Duarte GA; Souza TR; Faúndes A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 Nov; 75 Suppl 1():S59-S66. PubMed ID: 29645269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.
Bonzon M; Gross MM; Karch A; Grylka-Baeschlin S
Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():219-227. PubMed ID: 28478374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Factors associated with Chinese pregnant women's preference for a cesarean section based on the theory of planned behaviour.
Sun N; Yin X; Qiu L; Yang Q; Shi X; Chang J; Feng L; Gong Y
Trop Med Int Health; 2020 Feb; 25(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 31677204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pregnant women's preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth - a six-country cohort study.
Ryding EL; Lukasse M; Kristjansdottir H; Steingrimsdottir T; Schei B;
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Sep; 37(3):75-83. PubMed ID: 27269591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Increasing cesarean section rates: exploring the role of culture in an Australian community.
Walker R; Turnbull D; Wilkinson C
Birth; 2004 Jun; 31(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 15153131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Women's fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section--a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden.
Nieminen K; Stephansson O; Ryding EL
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(7):807-13. PubMed ID: 19488882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Changes in perceived knowledge about childbirth among pregnant women participating in the Senses of Birth intervention in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.
Fernandes LMM; Lansky S; Oliveira BJ; Friche AAL; Bozlak CT; Shaw BA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 May; 20(1):265. PubMed ID: 32370737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influencing factors associated with the mode of birth among childbearing women in Hunan Province: a cross-sectional study in China.
Shi Y; Jiang Y; Zeng Q; Yuan Y; Yin H; Chang C; Pang R
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 May; 16():108. PubMed ID: 27185247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Trends in birth choices after caesarean section in Japan: A national survey examining information and access to vaginal birth after caesarean.
Torigoe I; Shorten B; Yoshida S; Shorten A
Midwifery; 2016 Jun; 37():49-56. PubMed ID: 27217237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Swedish couples' attitudes towards birth, childbirth fear and birth preferences and relation to mode of birth - a longitudinal cohort study.
Hildingsson I
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2014 Jun; 5(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 24814442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative study of the experience of childbirth between women who preferred and had a caesarean section and women who preferred and had a vaginal birth.
Karlström A; Nystedt A; Hildingsson I
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2011 Aug; 2(3):93-9. PubMed ID: 21742287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Women's attitudes regarding mode of delivery and cesarean delivery on maternal request.
Pevzner L; Preslicka C; Bush MC; Chan K
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Jul; 24(7):894-9. PubMed ID: 21635180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Women's knowledge and attitude towards mode of delivery and frequency of cesarean section on mother's request in six public and private hospitals in Tehran, Iran, 2012.
Ghotbi F; Akbari Sene A; Azargashb E; Shiva F; Mohtadi M; Zadehmodares S; Farzaneh F; Yasai FA
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 May; 40(5):1257-66. PubMed ID: 24689693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Identification of factors influencing the rise of cesarean sections rates in Pakistan, using MCDM.
Ali Y; Khan MW; Mumtaz U; Salman A; Muhammad N; Sabir M
Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Oct; 31(8):1058-1069. PubMed ID: 30415618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sources, responses and moderators of childbirth fear in Australian women: a qualitative investigation.
Fenwick J; Toohill J; Creedy DK; Smith J; Gamble J
Midwifery; 2015 Jan; 31(1):239-46. PubMed ID: 25440298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predictors of preference for caesarean delivery among pregnant women in Beijing.
Zhang H; Wu J; Norris J; Guo L; Hu Y
J Int Med Res; 2017 Apr; 45(2):798-807. PubMed ID: 28345422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Birth preferences by nulliparous women and their partners in Turkey.
Serçekuş P; Egelioglu Cetisli N; İnci FH
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2015 Oct; 6(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 26842643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Fear-driven cesarean section on request].
Pawelec M; Pietras J; Karmowski A; Pałczyński B; Karmowski M; Nowak T
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2012 Aug; 33(194):86-9. PubMed ID: 23009005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Non-medical determinants of cesarean section in a medically dominated maternity system.
Dweik D; Girasek E; Mészáros G; Töreki A; Keresztúri A; Pál A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1025-33. PubMed ID: 25066090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Brazilian doctors' perspective on the second opinion strategy before a C-section.
Osis MJ; Cecatti JG; de Pádua KS; Faúndes A
Rev Saude Publica; 2006 Apr; 40(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 16583033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
