BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15311598)

  • 1. [Results of myringoplasty and type I tympanoplasty with the use of fascia, cartilage and perichondrium grafts].
    Gierek T; Slaska-Kaspera A; Majzel K; Klimczak-Gołab L
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2004; 58(3):529-33. PubMed ID: 15311598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The evaluation of cartilage and perichondrium grafts for the reconstruction of the tympanic membrane].
    Slaska-Kaspera A; Gierek T; Majzel K; Klimczak-Gołab L
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2003; 57(6):889-92. PubMed ID: 15049192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between cartilage-perichondrium composite 'ring' graft and temporalis fascia in type one tympanoplasty in children.
    Albirmawy OA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Sep; 124(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 20403227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three autologous substitutes for myringoplasty: a comparative study.
    Zhang ZG; Huang QH; Zheng YQ; Sun W; Chen YB; Si Y
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1234-8. PubMed ID: 21921853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients: Comparison of fascia and perichondrium grafts.
    Çayir S; Kayabaşi S
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 121():95-98. PubMed ID: 30878559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fascia versus cartilage graft in type I tympanoplasty: audiological outcome.
    Kim JY; Oh JH; Lee HH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e605-8. PubMed ID: 23172493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporalis fascia and cartilage-perichondrium composite shield grafts for reconstruction of the tympanic membrane.
    Yetiser S; Hidir Y
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2009 Aug; 118(8):570-4. PubMed ID: 19746755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The button graft technique for perforations affecting less than 25% of the tympanic membrane: a non-randomised comparison of a new modification to cartilage tympanoplasty with underlay and overlay grafts.
    Abdelghany AM
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 38(3):208-16. PubMed ID: 23745532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional results of temporalis fascia versus cartilage tympanoplasty in patients with bilateral chronic otitis media.
    Onal K; Arslanoglu S; Songu M; Demiray U; Demirpehlivan IA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Jan; 126(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 22032518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the anatomical and functional success of fascia and perichondrium grafts in transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty.
    Özdamar K; Sen A
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):67. PubMed ID: 31771648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double-Layer Tympanic Membrane Graft in Type I Tympanoplasty.
    Bedri EH; Korra B; Redleaf M; Worku A
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2019 Sep; 128(9):795-801. PubMed ID: 30991811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with double layer graft (modified sandwich fascia) technique and single layer graft (underlay fascia and underlay cartilage) technique.
    Nemade SV; Shinde KJ; Sampate PB
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 28855058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cartilage island versus temporalis fascia in high-risk tympanic perforation].
    Durán-Padilla CL; Martínez-Chávez J; Amador-Licona N; Pereyra-Nobara TA
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2017; 55 Suppl 1():S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28212476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty: a more effective composite graft model than temporalis fascia tympanoplasty.
    Kolethekkat AA; Al Abri R; Al Zaabi K; Al Marhoobi N; Jose S; Pillai S; Mathew J
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 29888699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Myringoplasty Quality Control Is Necessary: Comparison of Surgical Results of Two Consecutive Series in A Single Institution.
    Iso-Mustajärvi M; Dietz A; Löppönen H
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Apr; 14(1):135-139. PubMed ID: 29764787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty.
    Demirpehlivan IA; Onal K; Arslanoglu S; Songu M; Ciger E; Can N
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Mar; 268(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 21267588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomical and Functional Results of Medial and Lateral Surface of Temporal Muscle Fascia in Type 1 Tympanoplasties.
    Salcan İ
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 May; 100(4):237-240. PubMed ID: 32579383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Cartilage Palisades and Temporal Fascia in Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Bilateral Tympanic Membrane Perforations in Children.
    Gün T; Boztepe OF; Atan D; İkincioğulları A; Dere H
    J Int Adv Otol; 2017 Apr; 13(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 27879224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Transcanal Composite Chondroperichondrial Tympanoplasty Techniques.
    Gozeler MS; Sahin A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Mar; 100(3):192-195. PubMed ID: 31544506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty (Eavey technique) modified for adults.
    Lubianca-Neto JF
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Oct; 123(4):492-4. PubMed ID: 11020192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.