These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1531160)

  • 1. Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy.
    Soper NJ; Barteau JA; Clayman RV; Ashley SW; Dunnegan DL
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Feb; 174(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 1531160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a matched study.
    Sanabria JR; Clavien PA; Cywes R; Strasberg SM
    Can J Surg; 1993 Aug; 36(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 8103704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Personal experiences in 20 cases].
    Klaiber C; Z'Graggen K; Metzger A; Leepin H
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1990 Jun; 79(25):787-90. PubMed ID: 2142329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective comparative study between conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Chan HS; Ha XF; Ooi PJ; Mack P
    Singapore Med J; 1995 Aug; 36(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 8919158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Laparoscopic versus mini-cholecystectomy: analysis of hospital costs and social costs in a prospective randomized study].
    Secco GB; Cataletti M; Bonfante P; Baldi E; Davini MD; Biasotti B; Ravera G; Ferraris R
    Chir Ital; 2002; 54(5):685-92. PubMed ID: 12469466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Elective cholecystectomy by celioscopy versus subcostal approach cholecystectomy. Comparative study of postoperative pain and discomfort].
    Sézeur A; Benoit J; LeClerc P; Boureau F; Vibert JF; Deslandes M; Gallot D; Khneisser A; Gravié JF; Ayoub N
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1993; 17(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 8143950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective analysis of 192 consecutive cholecystectomies: a comparative study between laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Constant E; Janssen P; Nys JM; el Fouly PE; Lemmens F; Hachez L; Hauters P
    Acta Chir Belg; 1995; 95(6):254-60. PubMed ID: 8571715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy at Prince Abdulrahman Al Sudairy Hospital, Saudi Arabia.
    al Hadi FH; Chiedozi LC; Salem MM; George TV; Desouky M; Pasha SM
    East Afr Med J; 1998 Sep; 75(9):536-9. PubMed ID: 10493057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Brunei.
    Kok KY; Mathew VV; Tan KK; Yapp SK
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1998 Apr; 8(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 9566565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study].
    Dirksen CD; Schmitz RF; Hans KM; Nieman FH; Hoogenboom LJ; Go PM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2434-9. PubMed ID: 11776671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective randomised study of laparoscopic v. open cholecystectomy in aged patients with cholecystolithiasis.
    Huang SM; Wu CW; Lui WY; P'eng FK
    S Afr J Surg; 1996 Nov; 34(4):177-9; discussion 179-80. PubMed ID: 9015941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a teaching hospital.
    Cohen MM
    Can J Surg; 1992 Feb; 35(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1531440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized comparison of the metabolic and stress hormonal responses of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.
    Ortega AE; Peters JH; Incarbone R; Estrada L; Ehsan A; Kwan Y; Spencer CJ; Moore-Jeffries E; Kuchta K; Nicoloff JT
    J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Sep; 183(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 8784319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective, case matched comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic and open surgical live donor nephrectomy.
    Wolf JS; Marcovich R; Merion RM; Konnak JW
    J Urol; 2000 Jun; 163(6):1650-3. PubMed ID: 10799153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy.
    Attwood SE; Hill AD; Mealy K; Stephens RB
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1992 Nov; 74(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 1471836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic management and clinical outcome of emphysematous cholecystitis.
    Hazey JW; Brody FJ; Rosenblatt SM; Brodsky J; Malm J; Ponsky JL
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Oct; 15(10):1217-20. PubMed ID: 11727104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Gallbladder and common bile duct calculi: treatment with laparoscopy vs laparotomy. Costs and benefits].
    Melotti G; Bonilauri S; Lanzani A; Tamborrino E; Berselli T; Selmi I; Carretti A; Varoli M
    G Chir; 1993 Jul; 14(6):279-84. PubMed ID: 8398616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of hand assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for suspected renal cell carcinoma.
    Nelson CP; Wolf JS
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1989-94. PubMed ID: 11956425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical performance, safety and patient's benefit.
    Troidl H; Spangenberger W; Langen R; al-Jaziri A; Eypasch E; Neugebauer E; Dietrich J
    Endoscopy; 1992 May; 24(4):252-61. PubMed ID: 1535313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: experience in a district general hospital.
    Kirk SJ; Kelly SB; Aly SA; Sharma VK; Bateson PG; Panesar KJ
    Ulster Med J; 1992 Apr; 61(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 1535742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.