BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15313088)

  • 1. Mammography facility characteristics and repeat mammography use among Medicare beneficiaries.
    Engelman KK; Ellerbeck EF; Mayo MS; Markello SJ; Ahluwalia JS
    Prev Med; 2004 Sep; 39(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 15313088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
    Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
    Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying and characterizing one-time and never users of mammography screening services among medicare eligible women.
    Henderson LM; Schenck AP
    Prev Med; 2001 Jun; 32(6):529-33. PubMed ID: 11394957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Annual return rates to mammography facilities by women age 50 and older.
    Clapp EJ; Mayer JA
    Radiol Manage; 1994; 16(3):55-8. PubMed ID: 10136194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facility-based inreach strategies to promote annual mammograms.
    Mayer JA; Clapp EJ; Bartholomew S; offer J
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 7880555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of medicare funding on the use of mammography among older women: implications for improving access to screening.
    Kelaher M; Stellman JM
    Prev Med; 2000 Dec; 31(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 11133332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fecal occult blood test use by Kansas medicare beneficiaries.
    Engelman KK; Ellerbeck EF; Ahluwalia JS; Nazir N; Velasco A
    Prev Med; 2001 Dec; 33(6):622-6. PubMed ID: 11716659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.
    Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Antonucci DM; Rifkind S; Schachter M
    Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overuse of mammography during the first round of an organized breast cancer screening programme.
    Chamot E; Charvet A; Perneger TV
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):620-5. PubMed ID: 19522725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of geography on mammography use in California.
    Jackson MC; Davis WW; Waldron W; McNeel TS; Pfeiffer R; Breen N
    Cancer Causes Control; 2009 Oct; 20(8):1339-53. PubMed ID: 19449107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography-facility-based patient reminders and repeat mammograms for Medicare in New York State.
    Quinley J; Mahotière T; Messina CR; Lee TK; Mikail C
    Prev Med; 2004 Jan; 38(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 14672638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variability in the timing of repeat screening mammography.
    Jepson C; Barudin JL; Weiner JR
    Prev Med; 1997; 26(4):483-5. PubMed ID: 9245670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women.
    Armstrong K; Long JA; Shea JA
    Prev Med; 2004 Jun; 38(6):754-60. PubMed ID: 15193895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized controlled trial of a repeat mammography intervention: effect of adherence definitions on results.
    Partin MR; Slater JS; Caplan L
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):734-40. PubMed ID: 16043216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics of primary care physicians and their practices associated with mammography rates for older women.
    Van Harrison R; Janz NK; Wolfe RA; Tedeschi PJ; Stross JK; Huang X; McMahon LF
    Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9):1811-21. PubMed ID: 14584062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older?
    Smith-Bindman R; Quale C; Chu PW; Rosenberg R; Kerlikowske K
    Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 16641665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening mammography for Oklahoma Medicare beneficiaries: a national priority for quality improvement.
    Venkatappa S; Oehlert WH; Nguyen L; Austelle A; Bratzler DW
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2002 Oct; 95(10):655-60. PubMed ID: 12420415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography use in older women with regular physicians: what are the predictors?
    Mayer-Oakes SA; Atchison KA; Matthias RE; De Jong FJ; Lubben J; Schweitzer SO
    Am J Prev Med; 1996; 12(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 8776294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.