252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15313115)
1. Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila: Implications for public health policy.
Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J
Public Health Rep; 2004; 119(5):510-2. PubMed ID: 15313115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme Court clarifies the breadth of ERISA preemption.
Hershey N
Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Oct; 21(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15495741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Supreme Court rules HMO suits are preempted.
Prieto-Gonzalez M
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(4):774-6. PubMed ID: 15807366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. ERISA. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10628447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HMOs-health plans--failure to cover certain treatment-preemption. Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila.
Benefits Q; 2005; 21(4):69, 71-5. PubMed ID: 16524037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Preemption of a state "legislatively created" right to sue HMOs for negligence. Corporate Health Ins. Inc. v. Texas Dept. of Insurance.
Jordan KA
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Apr; ():13-24. PubMed ID: 10351769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The final chapter (maybe) of preemption of HMO accountability under state law.
Jordan K
Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Feb; ():15-27. PubMed ID: 14989070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of the recent Supreme Court rulings in Pegram and Rush Prudential on state regulation of managed care organizations.
Trueman DL
J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):107-32. PubMed ID: 12784923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Workers of the world, panic!
Parloff R
Fortune; 2004 Jul; 150(1):36, 38. PubMed ID: 15270460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The people vs HMOs.
Howe RF
Time; 1999 Feb; 153(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 10345773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Supreme Court strikes down state regulation of health plan coverage decisions.
Meadors GM
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(3):154-5. PubMed ID: 15672906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. Supreme Court wades into ERISA one more time.
Roeder KH; Rees JS
GHA Today; 2004 Aug; 48(7):3, 9. PubMed ID: 15500273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Managed care. New call for patients' bill of rights. Docs worry ruling limiting HMO suits will boost medical malpractice filings.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2004 Jun; 34(26):12. PubMed ID: 15242105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Law & psychiatry: Pegram v. Herdrich: the Supreme Court passes the buck on managed care.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2000 Oct; 51(10):1225-6, 1238. PubMed ID: 11013317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Supreme Court's pre-emptive strike against patients' rights to sue their HMOs.
Kopels S; Manselle T
Soc Work Health Care; 2006; 43(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 16723332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supreme Court to decide whether ERISA pre-empts negligence claims against HMOs.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Jan; 135(1):110-2. PubMed ID: 14959884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Erb CT; Rich RF
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15647587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. UR here: the Supreme Court's guide for managed care.
Sage WM
Health Aff (Millwood); 2000; 19(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 10992671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What recourse? Liability for managed-care decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(8):592-6. PubMed ID: 10954770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. ERISA preemption remains on the front burner.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Mar; 21(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 15011608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
