These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15313115)
21. Groping for the reins: ERISA, HMO malpractice, and enterprise liability. Kilcullen JK Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(1):7-50. PubMed ID: 8819595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. ERISA preemption: will the elimination of the ERISA preemption clause help or harm America's ability to deal with its pending health care crisis? Taylor DH J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(1):133-78. PubMed ID: 11187365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability. Mariner WK N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Pegram v. Herdrich. 530 U.S. 211 (2000). Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():159-60. PubMed ID: 12669324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Ryland BK Manag Care Interface; 2004 Oct; 17(10):55-8. PubMed ID: 15535079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Vicarious liability: is ERISA preemption a successful defense? Lederberg MB Med Health R I; 1997 Feb; 80(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 9046780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Is surgery delayed by HMO surgery denied? Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 May; 41(12):1. PubMed ID: 11995282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The changing world of HMO liability under ERISA. McAuliffe BE J Leg Med; 2001 Mar; 22(1):77-106. PubMed ID: 11330125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. High court rules ERISA pre-empts negligence claims against HMOs. Sfikas PM J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Oct; 135(10):1480-2. PubMed ID: 15551991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The Supreme Court lets HMOs off the hook. Rice B Med Econ; 2004 Jul; 81(14):14, 16. PubMed ID: 15357171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Supreme Court limits lawsuits against managed care organizations. Jost TS Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-417-26. PubMed ID: 15451950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Upon further review. 'External review' of medical claim denials is now the law of the land nearly nationwide. But the system has its fans and foes. Benko LB Mod Healthc; 2005 Feb; 35(6):28-31, 35. PubMed ID: 15730203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care. Bloche MG N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. ERISA's second wind: the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Aetna v Davila is a victory for health plans, but payers, providers must still negotiate potential mine fields. Manzanares J; Mandell J Healthc Leadersh Rep; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15771201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Health plan liability. Coleman D Healthplan; 1997; 38(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10176856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Breach of fiduciary duty. Feldman GE Cost Qual; 2000 Mar; 6(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 10788217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. ERISA preemption defenses rejected. Nealy v. US Healthcare HMO. Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Jan; 17(3):4-6. PubMed ID: 10724626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The swinging pendulum: the Supreme Court reverses course on ERISA and managed care. Kesselheim AS; Brennan TA Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):451-63. PubMed ID: 15742588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Legal challenges to managed care: another view. Hall MA Health Aff (Millwood); 1999; 18(6):246-8. PubMed ID: 10650708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]