These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15313323)

  • 1. A quantitative comparison of modulus images obtained using nanoindentation with strain elastograms.
    Srinivasan S; Krouskop T; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 30(7):899-918. PubMed ID: 15313323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing elastographic strain images with modulus images obtained using nanoindentation: preliminary results using phantoms and tissue samples.
    Srinivasan S; Krouskop T; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 30(3):329-43. PubMed ID: 15063515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of strain-based and model-based modulus elastography.
    Doyley MM; Srinivasan S; Pendergrass SA; Wu Z; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):787-802. PubMed ID: 15936495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear elasticity imaging: theory and phantom study.
    Erkamp RQ; Emelianov SY; Skovoroda AR; O'Donnell M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 May; 51(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 15217231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast-transfer improvement for electrode displacement elastography.
    Bharat S; Varghese T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(24):6403-18. PubMed ID: 17148825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elastographic imaging of low-contrast elastic modulus distributions in tissue.
    Kallel F; Ophir J; Magee K; Krouskop T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1998 Mar; 24(3):409-25. PubMed ID: 9587996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues.
    Ophir J; Alam SK; Garra B; Kallel F; Konofagou E; Krouskop T; Varghese T
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1999; 213(3):203-33. PubMed ID: 10420776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear strain imaging using shear deformations.
    Rao M; Varghese T; Madsen EL
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):412-23. PubMed ID: 18383661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transient elastography using impulsive ultrasound radiation force: a preliminary comparison with surface palpation elastography.
    Melodelima D; Bamber JC; Duck FA; Shipley JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):959-69. PubMed ID: 17445967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visualizing the radial and circumferential strain distribution within vessel phantoms using synthetic-aperture ultrasound elastography.
    Korukonda S; Doyley MM
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Aug; 59(8):1639-53. PubMed ID: 22899112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel fast full inversion based breast ultrasound elastography technique.
    Karimi H; Fenster A; Samani A
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):2219-33. PubMed ID: 23475227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fundamental mechanical limitations on the visualization of elasticity contrast in elastography.
    Ponnekanti H; Ophir J; Huang Y; Céspedes I
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 7571146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stability of heterogeneous elastography phantoms made from oil dispersions in aqueous gels.
    Madsen EL; Hobson MA; Shi H; Varghese T; Frank GR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 32(2):261-70. PubMed ID: 16464671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D prostate elastography: algorithm, simulations and experiments.
    Patil AV; Garson CD; Hossack JA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(12):3643-63. PubMed ID: 17664564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonic strain imaging and reconstructive elastography for biological tissue.
    Khaled W; Reichling S; Bruhns OT; Ermert H
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e199-202. PubMed ID: 16857230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating axial and lateral strain using a synthetic aperture elastographic imaging system.
    Korukonda S; Doyley MM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1893-908. PubMed ID: 21962579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of lesion boundary conditions on axial strain elastograms: a parametric study.
    Thitaikumar A; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1463-7. PubMed ID: 17561335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards clinical prostate ultrasound elastography using full inversion approach.
    Mousavi SR; Sadeghi-Naini A; Czarnota GJ; Samani A
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):033501. PubMed ID: 24593743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element modeling and intravascular ultrasound elastography of vulnerable plaques: parameter variation.
    Baldewsing RA; de Korte CL; Schaar JA; Mastik F; van der Steen AF
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):723-9. PubMed ID: 15047374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio and their trade-offs with resolution in axial-shear strain elastography.
    Thitaikumar A; Krouskop TA; Ophir J
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 17183125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.