These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15313744)

  • 1. Oversight of human participants research: identifying problems to evaluate reform proposals.
    Emanuel EJ; Wood A; Fleischman A; Bowen A; Getz KA; Grady C; Levine C; Hammerschmidt DE; Faden R; Eckenwiler L; Muse CT; Sugarman J
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Aug; 141(4):282-91. PubMed ID: 15313744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changing the paradigm: new directions in federal oversight of human research.
    Koski G
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2003; 37 Suppl 1():S2-6. PubMed ID: 14685070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Federal commissions and local IRBs.
    Yesley MS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 6643032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Canadian agency for the oversight of research involving humans: a reform proposal.
    Downie J
    Account Res; 2006; 13(1):75-100. PubMed ID: 16770860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Institutional Review Board Quality, Private Equity, and Promoting Ethical Human Subjects Research.
    Lynch HF; Rosenfeld S
    Ann Intern Med; 2020 Oct; 173(7):558-562. PubMed ID: 32687743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
    Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Institutional Review Boards: What Clinician Researchers Need to Know.
    Lapid MI; Clarke BL; Wright RS
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2019 Mar; 94(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 30832791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The new research ethic: will oversight requirements sink forensic research?
    Candilis PJ; Arikan R; Noone SB; Holzer JC
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 16186201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform.
    Silberman G; Kahn KL
    Milbank Q; 2011 Dec; 89(4):599-627. PubMed ID: 22188349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working with the institutional review board.
    Byerly WG
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jan; 66(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 19139484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Economies of scale in institutional review boards.
    Wagner TH; Cruz AM; Chadwick GL
    Med Care; 2004 Aug; 42(8):817-23. PubMed ID: 15258484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Protecting" or "Policing": Academic Researchers' View of IRBs in an Arab Context.
    Makhoul J; El-Alti L; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Sakr C; Nakkash R; Alali K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):25-35. PubMed ID: 25747688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical review in Pakistan: the credibility gap.
    Jafarey AM; Iqbal SP; Hassan M
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Dec; 62(12):1354-7. PubMed ID: 23866494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing communication among data monitoring committees and institutional review boards.
    Taylor HA; Chaisson L; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18559418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From Moving Beyond Compliance to Quality to Moving Beyond Quality to Effectiveness: Realities and Challenges.
    Tsan MF
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Jul; 14(3):204-208. PubMed ID: 31131677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What the ANPRM missed: additional needs for IRB reform.
    Lidz CW; Garverich S
    J Law Med Ethics; 2013; 41(2):390-6. PubMed ID: 23802892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.
    Enfield KB; Truwit JD
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18811996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Journalists, district attorneys and researchers: why IRBs should get in the middle.
    Chodos AH; Lee SJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 16():19. PubMed ID: 25889147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.