BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15314000)

  • 1. Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study.
    Abreu M; Yi-Ching L; Abreu AL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 15314000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of the number of basis images and projection array on caries detection using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 11803385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
    Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generation of TACT image slices using different reconstruction algorithms: effects on natural caries detection.
    Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Nov; 92(5):576-81. PubMed ID: 11709697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries.
    Shi XQ; Han P; Welander U; Angmar-Månsson B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 11175273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of the number of iterative restorations on tuned aperture computed tomography for approximal caries detection.
    Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 11641731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of angular disparity of basis images and projection geometry on caries detection using tuned-aperture computed tomography.
    Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Sep; 92(3):353-60. PubMed ID: 11552158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of caries with conventional digital imaging and tuned aperture computed tomography using CRT monitor and laptop displays.
    Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Aug; 88(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 10468469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. TACT imaging of primary caries.
    Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of data compression on proximal caries detection: observer performance with DenOptix photostimulable phosphor images.
    Pabla T; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Abreu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12820853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of caries with local CT.
    van Daatselaar AN; Tyndall DA; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 13679354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of induced mid-buccal/lingual alveolar bone defects.
    Nair MK; Bezik J
    J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1833-8. PubMed ID: 17076608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection.
    Abreu M; Mol A; Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 11250640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
    Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.