124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15314444)
1. [A comparative study on the predictive validity among pressure ulcer risk assessment scales].
Lee YH; Jeong IS; Jeon SS
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2003 Apr; 33(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 15314444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.
Adibelli S; Korkmaz F
J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 31491054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reusability of EMR Data for Applying Cubbin and Jackson Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale in Critical Care Patients.
Kim E; Choi M; Lee J; Kim YA
Healthc Inform Res; 2013 Dec; 19(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 24523990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Trauma-Surgery ICU Patients.
Higgins J; Casey S; Taylor E; Wilson R; Halcomb P
Crit Care Nurse; 2020 Dec; 40(6):52-61. PubMed ID: 33257967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive Validity of the Cubbin-Jackson and Braden Skin Risk Tools in Critical Care Patients: A Multisite Project.
Delawder JM; Leontie SL; Maduro RS; Morgan MK; Zimbro KS
Am J Crit Care; 2021 Mar; 30(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 33644804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Sunderland Scale and the Cubbin & Jackson Revised Scale in Portuguese.
Sousa B
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva; 2013; 25(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 23917975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction Pressure Ulcers in High Care Unit Patients: Evaluating Risk Factors and Predictive Scale Using a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Indraswari ADW; Aisyiyah U; Kurniawan K; Surboyo MDC
Avicenna J Med; 2024 Jan; 14(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 38694142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical Evaluation of the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale - A Secondary Analysis of a Retrospective Cohort Study Population of Intensive Care Patients.
Ahtiala MH; Soppi E; Kivimäki R
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Feb; 62(2):24-33. PubMed ID: 26901387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Braden Scale and Norton Scale modified by INSALUD in an acute care hospital: validity and cutoff point.
González-Ruiz JM; Sebastián-Viana T; Losa-Iglesias ME; Lema-Lorenzo I; Crespo FJ; Martín-Merino G; García-Martín MR; Velayos-Rodríguez E; Nogueiras-Quintas CG
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Nov; 27(11):506-11. PubMed ID: 25325227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the risk assessment pressure sore scale in intensive care patients: results of a prospective study.
Günes ÜY; Efteli E
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Apr; 61(4):58-62. PubMed ID: 25853378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of the current risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in intensive care (EVARUCI) and the Norton-MI scale in critically ill patients.
Lospitao-Gómez S; Sebastián-Viana T; González-Ruíz JM; Álvarez-Rodríguez J
Appl Nurs Res; 2017 Dec; 38():76-82. PubMed ID: 29241524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale, Norton Scale, and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic.
Šateková L; Žiaková K; Zeleníková R
Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 27874258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Scales- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Park SH; Lee HS
Iran J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 45(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 27114977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.
Bergstrom N; Demuth PJ; Braden BJ
Nurs Clin North Am; 1987 Jun; 22(2):417-28. PubMed ID: 3554150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Validity study of the current risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in intensive care (EVARUCI)].
González-Ruiz JM; Núñez-Méndez P; Balugo-Huertas S; Navarro-de la Peña L; García-Martín MR
Enferm Intensiva; 2008; 19(3):123-29, quiz 130-1. PubMed ID: 18840327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive validity of 4 risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcer development in a hospital setting.
Källman U; Lindgren M
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Feb; 27(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 24440864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk Assessment Tool for Pressure Ulcer Development in Indian Surgical Wards.
Kumari S; Sharma D; Rana A; Pathak R; Lal R; Kumar A; Biswal UC
Indian J Surg; 2015 Jun; 77(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 26246703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a new risk assessment scale for predicting pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.
Suriadi ; Sanada H; Sugama J; Thigpen B; Subuh M
Nurs Crit Care; 2008; 13(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18226053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
