These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15314444)

  • 21. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
    Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Validity of the Waterlow scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in the intensive care unit: a prospective analysis of 698 patients].
    Compton F; Strauss M; Hortig T; Frey J; Hoffmann F; Zidek W; Schäfer JH
    Pflege; 2008 Feb; 21(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 18478685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pressure sores in intensive care: defining their incidence and associated factors and assessing the utility of two pressure sore risk assessment tools.
    Boyle M; Green M
    Aust Crit Care; 2001 Feb; 14(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 11899757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Value of pressure injury assessment scales for patients in the intensive care unit: Systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Zhuang Y; Shen J; Chen X; Wen Q; Jiang Q; Lao Y
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2021 Jun; 64():103009. PubMed ID: 33640238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validity and reliability of the Waterlow scale for assessing pressure injury risk in critical adult patients: A multi-centre cohort study.
    Han L; Guo J; Zhang H; Lv L; Dong J; Zhang T; Yan F; Ma Y
    J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1875-1883. PubMed ID: 38205587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Value of detection of pentraxins 3 value combined with measurement of vascular lung water index in prognosis of patients with sepsis].
    Sun R; Wang K; Li F; Yang H; Sun X
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 25591437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predictive capacity of risk assessment scales and clinical judgment for pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis.
    García-Fernández FP; Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL; Agreda JJ
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 24280770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative study on the validity of fall risk assessment scales in korean hospitals.
    Kim KS; Kim JA; Choi YK; Kim YJ; Park MH; Kim HY; Song MS
    Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci); 2011 Mar; 5(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 25029947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of a pressure area risk calculator in an intensive care unit.
    Hunt J
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 1993 Dec; 9(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 8274831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting pressure sore risk with the Norton, Braden, and Waterlow scales in a Hong Kong rehabilitation hospital.
    Pang SM; Wong TK
    Nurs Res; 1998; 47(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 9610648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A risk assessment scale for the prediction of pressure sore development: reliability and validity.
    Lindgren M; Unosson M; Krantz AM; Ek AC
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Apr; 38(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 11940132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Norton, Waterlow, Braden, and Care Dependency Scales: comparing their validity when identifying patients' pressure sore risk.
    Balzer K; Pohl C; Dassen T; Halfens R
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 17667085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales.
    Defloor T; Grypdonck MF
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Mar; 14(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 15707448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of Braden Q, Garvin and Glamorgan risk assessment scales in paediatrics.
    Anthony D; Willock J; Baharestani M
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Aug; 19(3):98-105. PubMed ID: 20421164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
    Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Formulation of combined predictive indicators using logistic regression model in predicting sepsis and prognosis].
    Duan L; Zhang S; Lin Z
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2017 Feb; 29(2):139-144. PubMed ID: 28625261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale.
    Curley MA; Razmus IS; Roberts KE; Wypij D
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12552172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis.
    He W; Liu P; Chen HL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2012 Feb; 58(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 22316631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers.
    Schoonhoven L; Haalboom JR; Bousema MT; Algra A; Grobbee DE; Grypdonck MH; Buskens E;
    BMJ; 2002 Oct; 325(7368):797. PubMed ID: 12376437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.