These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15315244)

  • 1. The effect of seated positioning quality on typical 6- and 7-year-old children's object manipulation skills.
    Smith-Zuzovsky N; Exner CE
    Am J Occup Ther; 2004; 58(4):380-8. PubMed ID: 15315244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of school furniture on fourth grade children's on-task and sitting behavior in the classroom: a pilot study.
    Wingrat JK; Exner CE
    Work; 2005; 25(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 16179775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-COVID-19 ergonomic school furniture design under fuzzy logic.
    Incekara CO
    Work; 2021; 69(4):1197-1208. PubMed ID: 34459430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Indonesian National Standard for elementary school furniture based on children's anthropometry.
    Yanto ; Lu CW; Lu JM
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jul; 62():168-181. PubMed ID: 28411727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The zone of proximal development in in-hand manipulation skills of nondysfunctional 3- and 4-year-old children.
    Exner CE
    Am J Occup Ther; 1990 Oct; 44(10):884-91. PubMed ID: 2248350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures in Chilean schools.
    Castellucci HI; Arezes PM; Viviani CA
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 20031115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between screen-time and hand function, play and sensory processing in children without disabilities aged 4-7 years: A exploratory study.
    Dadson P; Brown T; Stagnitti K
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2020 Aug; 67(4):297-308. PubMed ID: 32003027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining construct validity of a new naturalistic observational assessment of hand skills for preschool- and school-age children.
    Chien CW; Brown T; McDonald R
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2012 Apr; 59(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 22448991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children's behaviour and the design of school furniture.
    Knight G; Noyes J
    Ergonomics; 1999 May; 42(5):747-60. PubMed ID: 10327894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Match between classroom dimensions and students' anthropometry: re-equipment according to European educational furniture standard.
    Macedo AC; Morais AV; Martins HF; Martins JC; Pais SM; Mayan OS
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 25790570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lack of conformity between Indian classroom furniture and student dimensions: proposed future seat/table dimensions.
    Savanur CS; Altekar CR; De A
    Ergonomics; 2007 Oct; 50(10):1612-25. PubMed ID: 17917902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Content validity of the In-Hand Manipulation Test.
    Exner CE
    Am J Occup Ther; 1993 Jun; 47(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 7685149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data.
    Dianat I; Karimi MA; Asl Hashemi A; Bahrampour S
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 22695080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Furniture Weight on Carrying, Lifting, and Turning of Chairs and Desks among Elementary School Children.
    Purwaningrum L; Funatsu K; Xiong J; Rosyidi CN; Muraki S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128843. PubMed ID: 26053154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. School furniture match to students' anthropometry in the Gaza Strip.
    Agha SR
    Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):344-54. PubMed ID: 20191409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the most relevant anthropometric dimensions for school furniture selection based on a study with students from one Chilean region.
    Castellucci HI; Arezes PM; Molenbroek JF
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt A():201-11. PubMed ID: 25151312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of classroom furniture to anthropometric measures of Turkish middle school students.
    Satır B; Erdoğan FÇ
    Work; 2021; 70(2):493-508. PubMed ID: 34633350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Classroom furniture dimensions and anthropometric measures in primary school.
    Panagiotopoulou G; Christoulas K; Papanckolaou A; Mandroukas K
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Mar; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 15105073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Degree of mismatch between anthropometric characteristics and school furniture in a sample of Spanish students aged 6-12 years old: A pilot study.
    Prieto-Lage I; Ayán C; Alonso-Fernández D; Paramés-González A; Carlos Argibay-González J; Toboada-Solla EM; Gutiérrez-Santiago A
    Arch Argent Pediatr; 2021 Dec; 119(6):386-393. PubMed ID: 34813231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry.
    Gouvali MK; Boudolos K
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Nov; 37(6):765-73. PubMed ID: 16442494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.