BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15316271)

  • 1. Standard setting for OSCEs: trial of borderline approach.
    Kilminster S; Roberts T
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 15316271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of the inclusion of simulated patient ratings on the reliability of OSCE assessments under the borderline regression method.
    Homer M; Pell G
    Med Teach; 2009 May; 31(5):420-5. PubMed ID: 19142798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do clinical clerks provide candidates with adequate formative assessment during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations?
    Reiter HI; Rosenfeld J; Nandagopal K; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 15316270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE.
    Moineau G; Power B; Pion AM; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2011 Feb; 45(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 21166691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.
    Chesser AM; Laing MR; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Brittenden J; Heys SD
    Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 15271042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning intimate examinations with simulated patients: the evaluation of medical students' performance.
    Hendrickx K; De Winter B; Tjalma W; Avonts D; Peeraer G; Wyndaele JJ
    Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):e139-47. PubMed ID: 19404886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehensive undergraduate medical assessments improve prediction of clinical performance.
    Wilkinson TJ; Frampton CM
    Med Educ; 2004 Oct; 38(10):1111-6. PubMed ID: 15461657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard setting in a small scale OSCE: a comparison of the Modified Borderline-Group Method and the Borderline Regression Method.
    Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto SM; Norman GR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 May; 11(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 16729239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Order effects in high stakes undergraduate examinations: an analysis of 5 years of administrative data in one UK medical school.
    Burt J; Abel G; Barclay M; Evans R; Benson J; Gurnell M
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012541. PubMed ID: 27729351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE Step 2 scores.
    Simon SR; Bui A; Day S; Berti D; Volkan K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 13(6):901-5. PubMed ID: 18070260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing students' communication skills: validation of a global rating.
    Scheffer S; Muehlinghaus I; Froehmel A; Ortwein H
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 17636371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The practical value of the standard error of measurement in borderline pass/fail decisions.
    Hays R; Gupta TS; Veitch J
    Med Educ; 2008 Aug; 42(8):810-5. PubMed ID: 18564094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advancing the objective structured clinical examination: sequential testing in theory and practice.
    Pell G; Fuller R; Homer M; Roberts T
    Med Educ; 2013 Jun; 47(6):569-77. PubMed ID: 23662874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AMEE Guide No. 25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician.
    Shumway JM; Harden RM;
    Med Teach; 2003 Nov; 25(6):569-84. PubMed ID: 15369904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problematizing the concept of the "borderline" group in performance assessments.
    Homer M; Pell G; Fuller R
    Med Teach; 2017 May; 39(5):469-475. PubMed ID: 28440718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective structured clinical exams: a critical review.
    Turner JL; Dankoski ME
    Fam Med; 2008 Sep; 40(8):574-8. PubMed ID: 18988044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sources of variation in performance on a shared OSCE station across four UK medical schools.
    Chesser A; Cameron H; Evans P; Cleland J; Boursicot K; Mires G
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 19493176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standard setting for progress tests: combining external and internal standards.
    Ricketts C; Freeman AC; Coombes LR
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):589-93. PubMed ID: 19493184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementing an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in dental education: effects on students' learning strategies.
    Schoonheim-Klein ME; Habets LL; Aartman IH; van der Vleuten CP; Hoogstraten J; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Nov; 10(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 17038015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.