These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15316469)

  • 1. Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study.
    Pancherz H; Michailidou C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):153-61; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation.
    Pancherz H; Fischer S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 14580015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):375-88. PubMed ID: 9753819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jun; 115(6):607-18. PubMed ID: 10358242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: Activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Baltromejus S; Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Dec; 24(6):627-37. PubMed ID: 12512780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in skeletal class Ⅱ female adolescents with different vertical patterns].
    Zhou J; Liu Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 33550344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of temporomandibular joints in relation to ages and vertical facial types in skeletal class II female patients: a multiple-cross-sectional study.
    Zhou J; Yang H; Li Q; Li W; Liu Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Apr; 24(1):467. PubMed ID: 38632555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Effective condylar growth" and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study.
    Pancherz H; Ruf S; Kohlhas P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Oct; 114(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 9790329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S; Baltromejus S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Feb; 71(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11211297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved clinical use of Twin-block and Herbst as a result of radiating viscoelastic tissue forces on the condyle and fossa in treatment and long-term retention: growth relativity.
    Voudouris JC; Kuftinec MM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):247-66. PubMed ID: 10715086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.
    Croft RS; Buschang PH; English JD; Meyer R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 10511673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Aug; 110(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 8760851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 9267575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment changes of hypo- and hyperdivergent Class II Herbst patients.
    Rogers K; Campbell PM; Tadlock L; Schneiderman E; Buschang PH
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Jan; 88(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 29016191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Effective" TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment.
    Serbesis-Tsarudis C; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 18298212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effect of semi-fixed Twin-block appliance on temporomandibular joint remodeling].
    Gong FF; Feng J; Hu Z; Shen G; Chen RJ; You QL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Aug; 20(4):409-12. PubMed ID: 21909609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does bite-jumping damage the TMJ? A prospective longitudinal clinical and MRI study of Herbst patients.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):183-99. PubMed ID: 10926428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Condylar growth and glenoid fossa displacement during childhood and adolescence.
    Buschang PH; Santos-Pinto A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Apr; 113(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 9563360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Condyle-fossa modifications and muscle interactions during Herbst treatment, Part 2. Results and conclusions.
    Voudouris JC; Woodside DG; Altuna G; Angelopoulos G; Bourque PJ; Lacouture CY; Kuftinec MM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jul; 124(1):13-29. PubMed ID: 12867894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.