BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15316590)

  • 1. Artificial intelligence: making decisions about artificial nutrition and hydration.
    Gordon M; Sheehan K
    J Nutr Health Aging; 2004; 8(4):254-6. PubMed ID: 15316590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Catholicism, death and modern medicine.
    Cahill LS
    America (NY); 2005 Apr; 192(15):14-7. PubMed ID: 16739271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition.
    Burke WJ; Pullicino P; Coverdale JF
    Neurology; 2007 Jan; 68(5):391-2; author reply 392. PubMed ID: 17265563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition.
    Cochrane T; Truog RD
    Neurology; 2007 Jan; 68(5):391; author reply 392. PubMed ID: 17261691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The controversy over artificial hydration and nutrition.
    Bernat JL; Beresford HR
    Neurology; 2006 Jun; 66(11):1618-9. PubMed ID: 16769929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A moral dilemma: the role of judicial intervention in withholding or withdrawing nutrition and hydration.
    Peccarelli AM
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):537-68. PubMed ID: 16622961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. End-of-life decisions: ethical principles.
    Myers J
    Origins; 2005 Sep; 35(15):248-53. PubMed ID: 16276668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The problem with home remedies: Manitoba, doctors and unilateral decisions in end-of-life care.
    Murphy P; Webster GC; Chaze B
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):71-3. PubMed ID: 20229431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Life and death decisions: a reply to Judge Peccarelli.
    Kramer IR
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):569-83. PubMed ID: 16622960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Terminating artificial nutrition and hydration in persistent vegetative state patients: current and proposed state laws.
    Larriviere D; Bonnie RJ
    Neurology; 2006 Jun; 66(11):1624-8. PubMed ID: 16571840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Ethical decision-making at the end of life--knowledge and attitudes of medical students].
    Weber M; Schildmann J; Schüz J; Herrmann E; Vollmann J; Rittner C
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jul; 129(28-29):1556-60. PubMed ID: 15243903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Terminating artificial nutrition and hydration in persistent vegetative state patients: current and proposed state laws.
    Machado C
    Neurology; 2007 Jan; 68(4):312; author reply 312-3. PubMed ID: 17242347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reflections on the Golubchuk case.
    Gesundheit B
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):73-4. PubMed ID: 20229432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Withholding and withdrawing life support: difficult decisions around care at the end of life.
    Solverson KJ; Roze des Ordons AL; Doig CJ
    Can J Anaesth; 2018 Jan; 65(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 29192394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Catholic tradition on forgoing life support.
    O'Rourke KD
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(3):537-53. PubMed ID: 16425504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attitudes and behaviors of Japanese physicians concerning withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for end-of-life patients: results from an Internet survey.
    Bito S; Asai A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 8():7. PubMed ID: 17577420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Who will decide to withdraw life support treatment of children?].
    Dahlquist G
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Apr 1-7; 106(14):985. PubMed ID: 19485029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intent, authority, and tradition at the end of life.
    Hackler C
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):64-5. PubMed ID: 20229427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No ethical or legal imperative to provide life support to a permanently unaware patient.
    Cantor NL
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):58-9. PubMed ID: 20229424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Position statement on laws and regulations concerning life-sustaining treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration, for patients lacking decision-making capacity.
    Bacon D; Williams MA; Gordon J
    Neurology; 2007 Apr; 68(14):1097-100. PubMed ID: 17404191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.