These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15317449)

  • 1. Combination of a naive Bayes classifier with consensus scoring improves enrichment of high-throughput docking results.
    Klon AE; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Med Chem; 2004 Aug; 47(18):4356-9. PubMed ID: 15317449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of machine learning to improve the results of high-throughput docking against the HIV-1 protease.
    Klon AE; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2216-24. PubMed ID: 15554692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finding more needles in the haystack: A simple and efficient method for improving high-throughput docking results.
    Klon AE; Glick M; Thoma M; Acklin P; Davies JW
    J Med Chem; 2004 May; 47(11):2743-9. PubMed ID: 15139752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hierarchical Naïve Bayes Model for handling sample heterogeneity in classification problems: an application to tissue microarrays.
    Demichelis F; Magni P; Piergiorgi P; Rubin MA; Bellazzi R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 7():514. PubMed ID: 17125514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Machine learning in prognosis of the femoral neck fracture recovery.
    Kukar M; Kononenko I; Silvester T
    Artif Intell Med; 1996 Oct; 8(5):431-51. PubMed ID: 8955855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting carcinoid heart disease with the noisy-threshold classifier.
    van Gerven MA; Jurgelenaite R; Taal BG; Heskes T; Lucas PJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 17098402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective docking study of PDE4B ligands and an analysis of the behavior of selected scoring functions.
    Mpamhanga CP; Chen B; McLay IM; Ormsby DL; Lindvall MK
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1061-74. PubMed ID: 16045302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Naïve Bayes classification using 2D pharmacophore feature triplet vectors.
    Watson P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jan; 48(1):166-78. PubMed ID: 18183968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SeleX-CS: a new consensus scoring algorithm for hit discovery and lead optimization.
    Bar-Haim S; Aharon A; Ben-Moshe T; Marantz Y; Senderowitz H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Mar; 49(3):623-33. PubMed ID: 19231809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual screening to enrich a compound collection with CDK2 inhibitors using docking, scoring, and composite scoring models.
    Cotesta S; Giordanetto F; Trosset JY; Crivori P; Kroemer RT; Stouten PF; Vulpetti A
    Proteins; 2005 Sep; 60(4):629-43. PubMed ID: 16028223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complementarity of hydrophobic properties in ATP-protein binding: a new criterion to rank docking solutions.
    Pyrkov TV; Kosinsky YA; Arseniev AS; Priestle JP; Jacoby E; Efremov RG
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):388-98. PubMed ID: 17094116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein docking using surface matching and supervised machine learning.
    Bordner AJ; Gorin AA
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):488-502. PubMed ID: 17444516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.
    Mooij WT; Verdonk ML
    Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(2):272-87. PubMed ID: 16106379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition.
    Lensink MF; Méndez R; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):704-18. PubMed ID: 17918726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexible side chain models improve enrichment rates in in silico screening.
    Kokh DB; Wenzel W
    J Med Chem; 2008 Oct; 51(19):5919-31. PubMed ID: 18771256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
    Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AClAP, Autonomous hierarchical agglomerative Cluster Analysis based protocol to partition conformational datasets.
    Bottegoni G; Rocchia W; Recanatini M; Cavalli A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e58-65. PubMed ID: 16873522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study on feature selection methods for drug discovery.
    Liu Y
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1823-8. PubMed ID: 15446842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of scoring functions for protein--ligand docking.
    Seifert MH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):602-12. PubMed ID: 18293951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.