307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15317952)
1. Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients for metastases.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Herborn CU; Goyen M; Oberhoff C; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG; Barkhausen J
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 15317952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole-body MRI for metastases screening: a preliminary study using 3D VIBE sequences with automatic subtraction between noncontrast and contrast enhanced images.
Thomson V; Pialat JB; Gay F; Coulon A; Voloch A; Granier A; Guérin JC; Viallon M; Berthezene Y
Am J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jun; 31(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 18525309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold MR imaging for whole-body tumor staging in less than 15 minutes: a feasibility study.
Lauenstein TC; Goehde SC; Herborn CU; Treder W; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Barkhausen J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):445-9. PubMed ID: 12130448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI in detecting bone metastasis.
Del Vescovo R; Frauenfelder G; Giurazza F; Piccolo CL; Cazzato RL; Grasso RF; Schena E; Zobel BB
Radiol Med; 2014 Oct; 119(10):758-66. PubMed ID: 24638912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Detection of bone metastasis of prostate cancer - comparison of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy].
Ketelsen D; Röthke M; Aschoff P; Merseburger AS; Lichy MP; Reimold M; Claussen CD; Schlemmer HP
Rofo; 2008 Aug; 180(8):746-52. PubMed ID: 18512192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment--utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Onishi Y; Takenaka D; Nogami M; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Kotani Y; Sugimura K
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):643-54. PubMed ID: 18539889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-small cell lung cancer staging: efficacy comparison of integrated PET/CT versus 3.0-T whole-body MR imaging.
Yi CA; Shin KM; Lee KS; Kim BT; Kim H; Kwon OJ; Choi JY; Chung MJ
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):632-42. PubMed ID: 18552311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging of hepatic metastasis in patients with malignant melanoma: evaluation of suspected lesions screened at contrast-enhanced CT.
Sofue K; Tateishi U; Tsurusaki M; Arai Y; Yamazaki N; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):714-8. PubMed ID: 21353412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "One-stop-shop" staging: should we prefer FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the detection of bone metastases?
Heusner T; Gölitz P; Hamami M; Eberhardt W; Esser S; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 19945240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI of the thorax during whole-body MRI: evaluation of different MR sequences and comparison to thoracic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).
Frericks BB; Meyer BC; Martus P; Wendt M; Wolf KJ; Wacker F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):538-45. PubMed ID: 18224677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the extent of metastases of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors using whole-body PET, CT, MRI, PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Seemann MD; Meisetschlaeger G; Gaa J; Rummeny EJ
Eur J Med Res; 2006 Feb; 11(2):58-65. PubMed ID: 16504962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR imaging of hepatic metastases caused by neuroendocrine tumors: comparing four techniques.
Dromain C; de Baere T; Baudin E; Galline J; Ducreux M; Boige V; Duvillard P; Laplanche A; Caillet H; Lasser P; Schlumberger M; Sigal R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jan; 180(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 12490490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of functional magnetic resonance imaging in assessing metastatic leiomyosarcoma response to chemoembolization.
Vossen JA; Kamel IR; Buijs M; Liapi E; Georgiades CS; Hong K; Geschwind JF
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 18520535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3D MR pulmonary angiography, contrast-enhanced low-flip angle 3D GRE, and nonenhanced free-induction FISP sequences.
Kalb B; Sharma P; Tigges S; Ray GL; Kitajima HD; Costello JR; Chen Z; Martin DR
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):271-8. PubMed ID: 22438448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of whole-body MR with T2- and T1-weighted real-time steady-state free precession sequences during continuous table movement to depict metastases.
Brauck K; Zenge MO; Vogt FM; Quick HH; Stock F; Trarbach T; Ladd ME; Barkhausen J
Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):910-6. PubMed ID: 18187400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whole-body MRI using a rolling table platform for the detection of bone metastases.
Lauenstein TC; Freudenberg LS; Goehde SC; Ruehm SG; Goyen M; Bosk S; Debatin JF; Barkhausen J
Eur Radiol; 2002 Aug; 12(8):2091-9. PubMed ID: 12136329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and safety of MR imaging with liver-specific contrast agent: U.S. multicenter phase III study.
Bluemke DA; Sahani D; Amendola M; Balzer T; Breuer J; Brown JJ; Casalino DD; Davis PL; Francis IR; Krinsky G; Lee FT; Lu D; Paulson EK; Schwartz LH; Siegelman ES; Small WC; Weber TM; Welber A; Shamsi K
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 16126918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lung morphology: fast MR imaging assessment with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold technique: initial experience with patients.
Biederer J; Both M; Graessner J; Liess C; Jakob P; Reuter M; Heller M
Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):242-9. PubMed ID: 12511697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
