These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15318721)

  • 1. A method of computing restricted best linear unbiased prediction of breeding values for some animals in a population.
    Satoh M
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2253-8. PubMed ID: 15318721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adapting best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for timely genetic evaluation: I. Progeny traits in a single contemporary group for each sex.
    Harris DL; Lofgren DL; Stewart TS; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3209-22. PubMed ID: 2613570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adapting best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for timely genetic evaluation: II. Progeny traits in multiple contemporary groups within a herd.
    Lofgren DL; Harris DL; Stewart TS; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3223-42. PubMed ID: 2613571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An alternative derivation method of mixed model equations from best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and restricted BLUP of breeding values not using maximum likelihood.
    Satoh M
    Anim Sci J; 2018 Jun; 89(6):876-879. PubMed ID: 29687542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Animal model and multiple trait BLUP applied in poultry genetic evaluation].
    Pang H; Wu CX; Zhang Y; Gong GF; Bi YH
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 2486251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simultaneous procedure for deriving selection indexes with multiple restrictions.
    Lin CY
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 83(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 15705748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Study on BLUP with reduced animal model in evaluation of performance tested males].
    Gong BY
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 2629910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of selection based on phenotype, selection index and best linear unbiased prediction using data from a closed broiler line.
    Morris AJ; Pollott GE
    Br Poult Sci; 1997 Jul; 38(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 9280349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.
    Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():89. PubMed ID: 26576649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population undergoing selection.
    Boligon AA; Long N; Albuquerque LG; Weigel KA; Gianola D; Rosa GJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4716-22. PubMed ID: 23372045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absorption of equations for non-parents for an animal model with maternal effects and genetic groups.
    Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):4014-25. PubMed ID: 2286544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The selection index--then, now, and for the future.
    Hazel LN; Dickerson GE; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Oct; 77(10):3236-51. PubMed ID: 7836610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative animal models with maternal effects and foster dams.
    Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):4026-38. PubMed ID: 2286545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of robust procedures for estimation of breeding values in multiple-trait random regression test-day model.
    Jamrozik J; Fatehi J; Schaeffer LR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Feb; 124(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 17302954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of the dominance merit in noninbred populations without recourse to its inverted relationship matrix.
    Chalh A; El Gazzah M
    J Appl Genet; 2003; 44(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 12590182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Method R variance components procedure: application on the simple breeding value model.
    Reverter A; Golden BL; Bourdon RM; Brinks JS
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Sep; 72(9):2247-53. PubMed ID: 8002443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of selection methods at the same level of inbreeding.
    Quinton M; Smith C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 1582935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.