These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15318721)

  • 21. Optimizing selection on multiple identified quantitative trait loci in population with overlapping generations.
    Tang GQ; Li XW
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 May; 33(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 16722338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of BLUE and BLUP/REML in the selection of clones and families of potato (Solanum tuberosum).
    Ticona-Benavente CA; da Silva Filho DF
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Dec; 14(4):18421-30. PubMed ID: 26782490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Solving large mixed linear models using preconditioned conjugate gradient iteration.
    Strandén I; Lidauer M
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Dec; 82(12):2779-87. PubMed ID: 10629826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reduced animal model with differential genetic grouping for direct and maternal effects.
    Cantet RJ; Schaeffer LR; Smith C
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1730-41. PubMed ID: 1634397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of genomic information increases the accuracy of breeding value predictions for sea louse (Caligus rogercresseyi) resistance in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Correa K; Bangera R; Figueroa R; Lhorente JP; Yáñez JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):15. PubMed ID: 28143593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sequential transformation for multiple traits for estimation of (co)variance components with a derivative-free algorithm for restricted maximum likelihood.
    Van Vleck LD; Boldman KG
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Apr; 71(4):836-44. PubMed ID: 8478285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation criterion for response to selection with constraint.
    Satoh M
    Anim Sci J; 2019 Apr; 90(4):462-466. PubMed ID: 30723993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficient selection against categorically scored hip dysplasia in dogs is possible using best linear unbiased prediction and optimum contribution selection: a simulation study.
    Malm S; Sørensen AC; Fikse WF; Strandberg E
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Apr; 130(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 23496016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimal multiple trait selection for multiple linked quantitative trait loci.
    Tang GQ; Li XW
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Mar; 33(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 16553210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep.
    Bolormaa S; Brown DJ; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2017 Jun; 48(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 28211150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetic components of milk Fourier-transform infrared spectra used to predict breeding values for milk composition and quality traits in dairy goats.
    Dagnachew BS; Meuwissen TH; Adnøy T
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):5933-42. PubMed ID: 23831101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Estimates of breeding value of Inner Mongolia cashmere goats using animal model BLUP method].
    Li YR; Li JQ; Gao DP; Zhang LL; Zhou HM; An YJ; Wulanbateer ; Wang B; Zhang YB
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2000; 27(9):777-86. PubMed ID: 11132493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rapid inversion of dominance relationship matrices for noninbred populations by including sire by dam subclass effects.
    Hoeschele I; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):557-69. PubMed ID: 2045562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture.
    Ni G; Cavero D; Fangmann A; Erbe M; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):8. PubMed ID: 28093063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prediction accuracies for growth and wood attributes of interior spruce in space using genotyping-by-sequencing.
    Gamal El-Dien O; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Chen C; Porth I; El-Kassaby YA
    BMC Genomics; 2015 May; 16(1):370. PubMed ID: 25956247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.
    Hayes BJ; Visscher PM; Goddard ME
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Feb; 91(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 19220931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genetic evaluation by BLUP in two-breed terminal crossbreeding systems under dominance.
    Lo LL; Fernando RL; Grossman M
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Nov; 75(11):2877-84. PubMed ID: 9374299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.