222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15319392)
21. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA.
Gleicher N; Weghofer A; Barad D
Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1945-50. PubMed ID: 16690628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Redefining success in the context of elective single embryo transfer: evidence, intuition and financial reality.
Bhattacharya S; Templeton A
Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1939-42. PubMed ID: 15217994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years.
Veleva Z; Vilska S; Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2098-102. PubMed ID: 16740524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Elective single embryo transfer: a justified policy for selected patients].
Giorgetti C; Chabert-Orsini V; Barry B; Chinchole JM; Franquebalme JP; Hans E; Glowaczower E; Terriou P; Sitri MC; Salzmann J; Thibault MC; Roulier R
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Apr; 34(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 16603403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.
El-Toukhy T; Kamal A; Wharf E; Grace J; Bolton V; Khalaf Y; Braude P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19567414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Elective transfer of single fresh blastocysts and later transfer of cryostored blastocysts reduces the twin pregnancy rate and can improve the in vitro fertilization live birth rate in younger women.
Henman M; Catt JW; Wood T; Bowman MC; de Boer KA; Jansen RP
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1620-7. PubMed ID: 16359955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Is BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) truly the best?
Griesinger G; Dafopoulos K; Schultze-Mosgau A; Felberbaum R; Diedrich K
Hum Reprod; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1239-41. PubMed ID: 15105385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
Andersen AN; Gianaroli L; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG;
Hum Reprod; 2005 May; 20(5):1158-76. PubMed ID: 15665021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Working to eliminate multiple pregnancies: a success story in Québec.
Bissonnette F; Phillips SJ; Gunby J; Holzer H; Mahutte N; St-Michel P; Kadoch IJ
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Oct; 23(4):500-4. PubMed ID: 21840757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Is there a single 'parameter of excellence'?
Pinborg A; Loft A; Ziebe S; Nyboe Andersen A
Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1052-4. PubMed ID: 15044405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2002. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
; Andersen AN; Gianaroli L; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG
Hum Reprod; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1680-97. PubMed ID: 16585126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Avoidance of multiple pregnancy by use of single embryo transfer.
Hamberger L; Hardarson T; Nygren KG
Minerva Ginecol; 2005 Feb; 57(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 15758862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reduction of multiple pregnancy in ART.
Julavijitphong S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S136-41. PubMed ID: 21213511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reducing multiple pregnancy in assisted reproduction technology: towards a policy of single blastocyst transfer in younger women.
Kalu E; Thum MY; Abdalla H
BJOG; 2008 Aug; 115(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 18518874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Laser assisted hatching in good prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
Sagoskin AW; Levy MJ; Tucker MJ; Richter KS; Widra EA
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):283-7. PubMed ID: 17094975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Single embryo transfer is an option in frozen embryo transfer.
Hydén-Granskog C; Unkila-Kallio L; Halttunen M; Tiitinen A
Hum Reprod; 2005 Oct; 20(10):2935-8. PubMed ID: 15980000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates.
Criniti A; Thyer A; Chow G; Lin P; Klein N; Soules M
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1613-9. PubMed ID: 16359954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection.
Shih W; Rushford DD; Bourne H; Garrett C; McBain JC; Healy DL; Baker HW
Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1644-53. PubMed ID: 18442997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
