These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15319507)

  • 1. Comparison of narrow-angle fan-beam and pencil-beam densitometers: in vivo and phantom study of the effect of bone density, scan mode, and tissue depth on spine measurements.
    Laskey MA; Murgatroyd PR; Prentice A
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 15319507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers--bone mineral density and body composition studies.
    Oldroyd B; Smith AH; Truscott JG
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 57(8):977-87. PubMed ID: 12879093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pediatric in vivo cross-calibration between the GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX-L bone densitometers.
    Crabtree NJ; Shaw NJ; Boivin CM; Oldroyd B; Truscott JG
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):2157-67. PubMed ID: 16234997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan-beam.
    Mazess RB; Hanson JA; Payne R; Nord R; Wilson M
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 10793875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evaluation of consistency between body composition assessments in pediatric population using pencil beam and fan beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometers.
    Pludowski P; Jaworski M; Matusik H; Kobylinska M; Klimek P; Lorenc RS
    J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 20171570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of differences between fan-beam and pencil-beam densitometers.
    Mazess RB; Barden HS
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Oct; 67(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 11000342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Manufacture and evaluation of a spine phantom used in the cross-calibration of DXA bone densitometry].
    Yang DZ; Shang JY; Song WZ; Chen J; Zhu D; Wang WZ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 25(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 12905736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of increased axial rotation angle on bone mineral density measurements of the lumbar spine.
    Jeon YK; Shin MJ; Shin YB; Kim CR; Kim SJ; Ko HY; Kim IJ
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2150-4. PubMed ID: 24491384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inclusion of Regional Body Composition Parameters Improves Bone Mineral Density Cross-Calibration Between GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Densitometers.
    Saarelainen J; Hakulinen M; Rikkonen T; Kröger H; Koivumaa-Honkanen H; Honkanen R; Jurvelin JS
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 27546558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
    Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of pencil-, fan-, and cone-beam dual X-ray absorptiometers for evaluation of bone mineral content in excised rat bone.
    Libouban H; Simon Y; Silve C; Legrand E; Baslé MF; Audran M; Chappard D
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 12665635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurements of bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur using lunar prodigy and the new pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Choi D; Kim DY; Han CS; Kim S; Bok HS; Huh W; Ko JW; Hong SH
    Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19924413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
    Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pediatric radiation dose and risk from bone density measurements using a GE Lunar Prodigy scanner.
    Damilakis J; Solomou G; Manios GE; Karantanas A
    Osteoporos Int; 2013 Jul; 24(7):2025-31. PubMed ID: 23306822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design.
    Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Dec; 61(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 9383269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multicenter comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers: in vivo and in vitro measurements of bone mineral content and density.
    Economos CD; Nelson ME; Fiatarone MA; Dallal GE; Heymsfield SB; Wang J; Russell-Aulet M; Yasumura S; Ma R; Vaswani AN; Pierson RN
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Feb; 11(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 8822352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-calibration of a fan-beam X-ray densitometer with a pencil-beam system.
    Bouyoucef SE; Cullum ID; Ell PJ
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 69(822):522-31. PubMed ID: 8757654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
    Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
    Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers.
    Griffiths MR; Noakes KA; Pocock NA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 9240734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.