These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15320378)

  • 1. A test of the generality of perceptually based categories found in infants: attentional differences toward natural kinds by New World monkeys.
    Neiworth JJ; Parsons RR; Hassett JM
    Dev Sci; 2004 Apr; 7(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 15320378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) discriminate between pictures of conspecific males and females without specific training.
    Koba R; Izumi A
    Behav Processes; 2008 Sep; 79(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 18515019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural markers of subordinate-level categorization in 6- to 7-month-old infants.
    Quinn PC; Doran MM; Reiss JE; Hoffman JE
    Dev Sci; 2010 May; 13(3):499-507. PubMed ID: 20443970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Basic-level and superordinate-like categorical representations in early infancy.
    Behl-Chadha G
    Cognition; 1996 Aug; 60(2):105-41. PubMed ID: 8811742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can chimpanzee infants (Pan troglodytes) form categorical representations in the same manner as human infants (Homo sapiens)?
    Murai C; Kosugi D; Tomonaga M; Tanaka M; Matsuzawa T; Itakura S
    Dev Sci; 2005 May; 8(3):240-54. PubMed ID: 15819756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial grammar learning in tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) in varying stimulus contexts.
    Neiworth JJ; London JM; Flynn MJ; Rupert DD; Alldritt O; Hyde C
    J Comp Psychol; 2017 May; 131(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 28277720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Color discrimination by the cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus oedipus) and its relation to fruit coloration.
    Savage A; Dronzek LA; Snowdon CT
    Folia Primatol (Basel); 1987; 49(2):57-69. PubMed ID: 3136059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. fMRI in alert, behaving monkeys: an adaptation of the human infant familiarization novelty preference procedure.
    Joseph JE; Powell DK; Andersen AH; Bhatt RS; Dunlap MK; Foldes ST; Forman E; Hardy PA; Steinmetz NA; Zhang Z
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Oct; 157(1):10-24. PubMed ID: 16675025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classifying partial exemplars: seeing less and learning more.
    Taylor EG; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1374-80. PubMed ID: 19686031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do 9-month-old infants categorize human and ape faces? A rapid repetition ERP study.
    Peykarjou S; Pauen S; Hoehl S
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Sep; 51(9):866-78. PubMed ID: 24890394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual categorization of natural stimuli by domestic dogs.
    Range F; Aust U; Steurer M; Huber L
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Apr; 11(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 18026761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artifactual kinds and functional design features: what a primate understands without language.
    Hauser MD
    Cognition; 1997 Sep; 64(3):285-308. PubMed ID: 9426504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infants' expectations about object label reference.
    Graham SA; Baker RK; Poulin-Dubois D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1998 Sep; 52(3):103-13. PubMed ID: 9849097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrasting patterns of comprehension for superordinate, basic-level, and subordinate names in semantic dementia and aphasic stroke patients.
    Crutch SJ; Warrington EK
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Jun; 25(4):582-600. PubMed ID: 19086203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of novel labels on visual processing during infancy.
    Mather E; Schafer G; Houston-Price C
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Nov; 29(Pt 4):783-805. PubMed ID: 21199503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can patients with Alzheimer's disease learn a category implicitly?
    Bozoki A; Grossman M; Smith EE
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):816-27. PubMed ID: 16229868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The linguistic construction of social categories in toddlers.
    Diesendruck G; Deblinger-Tangi R
    Child Dev; 2014; 85(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 23711159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of category specificity in infancy--What can we learn from electrophysiology?
    Hoehl S
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Mar; 83():114-122. PubMed ID: 26305018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social interaction with non-averse group-mates modifies a learned food aversion in single- and mixed-species groups of tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis and S. labiatus).
    Prescott MJ; Buchanan-Smith HM; Smith AC
    Am J Primatol; 2005 Apr; 65(4):313-26. PubMed ID: 15834888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. By land or by sea: the role of perceptual similarity in infants' categorization of animals.
    Oakes LM; Coppage DJ; Dingel A
    Dev Psychol; 1997 May; 33(3):396-407. PubMed ID: 9149919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.