108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15321547)
1. Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomised comparison of Oxford, lateral and sitting positions.
Russell R; Popat M; Richards E; Burry J
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2002 Jul; 11(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 15321547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the lateral, Oxford and sitting positions for performing combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section.
Rucklidge MW; Paech MJ; Yentis SM
Anaesthesia; 2005 Jun; 60(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 15918823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-shot spinal anaesthesia, combined spinal-epidural and epidural volume extension for elective caesarean section: a randomized comparison.
Tyagi A; Girotra G; Kumar A; Kumar S; Sethi AK; Mohta M
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2009 Jul; 18(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 19447598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the haemodynamic effects of lateral and sitting positions during induction of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Obasuyi BI; Fyneface-Ogan S; Mato CN
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2013 Apr; 22(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 23453465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of lateral versus supine wedged position on development of spinal blockade and hypotension.
Hartley H; Seed PT; Ashworth H; Kubli M; O'Sullivan G; Reynolds F
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2001 Jul; 10(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 15321608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Left lateral vs. supine, wedged position for development of block after combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section.
Lewis NL; Ritchie EL; Downer JP; Nel MR
Anaesthesia; 2004 Sep; 59(9):894-8. PubMed ID: 15310354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do we need cephalic spread of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section? A different approach to CSE-EVE for reducing hypotension.
Fabris LK; Belci D; Zdravčević KŠ; Hrgović Z; Šakić L
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2013 Aug; 217(4):130-8. PubMed ID: 23982939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension.
Coppejans HC; Hendrickx E; Goossens J; Vercauteren MP
Anesth Analg; 2006 Jan; 102(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 16368837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oxford positioning technique improves haemodynamic stability and predictability of block height of spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section.
Stoneham MD; Eldridge J; Popat M; Russell R
Int J Obstet Anesth; 1999 Oct; 8(4):242-8. PubMed ID: 15321118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of sufentanil or morphine added to hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Karaman S; Kocabas S; Uyar M; Hayzaran S; Firat V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Apr; 23(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 16438758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of varying doses of fentanyl with low dose spinal bupivacaine for caesarean delivery in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension.
Jain K; Grover VK; Mahajan R; Batra YK
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2004 Oct; 13(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 15477049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the maternal and neonatal effects of epidural block and of combined spinal-epidural block for Cesarean section.
Karaman S; Akercan F; Akarsu T; Firat V; Ozcan O; Karadadas N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jul; 121(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 15989982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized trial of maximum cephalad sensory blockade with single-shot spinal compared with combined spinal-epidural techniques for cesarean delivery.
Horstman DJ; Riley ET; Carvalho B
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):240-5. PubMed ID: 19095857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of epidural volume extension on spinal block with hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine for Caesarean delivery.
Kucukguclu S; Unlugenc H; Gunenc F; Kuvaki B; Gokmen N; Gunasti S; Guclu S; Yilmaz F; Isik G
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Apr; 25(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 17888192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized comparison of low doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
Leo S; Sng BL; Lim Y; Sia AT
Anesth Analg; 2009 Nov; 109(5):1600-5. PubMed ID: 19843797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a comparison of three plain local anesthetics.
Coppejans HC; Vercauteren MP
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2006; 57(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 16617756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and diamorphine as adjuncts in spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section.
Lane S; Evans P; Arfeen Z; Misra U
Anaesthesia; 2005 May; 60(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 15819765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is ephedrine infusion more effective at preventing hypotension than traditional prehydration during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in African parturients?
Desalu I; Kushimo OT
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2005 Oct; 14(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 16154346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomised controlled trial of combined spinal epidural vs. spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: vasopressor requirements and cardiovascular changes.
Macfarlane AJ; Pryn A; Litchfield KN; Bryden F; Young S; Weir C; McGrady EM
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19122552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial comparing low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and conventional epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia.
Berends N; Teunkens A; Vandermeersch E; Van de Velde M
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2005; 56(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 16013660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
