These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15322441)

  • 1. Reproducibility indices applied to cervical pressure pain threshold measurements in healthy subjects.
    Prushansky T; Dvir Z; Defrin-Assa R
    Clin J Pain; 2004; 20(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 15322441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of pressure pain threshold and visual analog scale findings in chronic whiplash patients.
    Prushansky T; Handelzalts S; Pevzner E
    Clin J Pain; 2007 May; 23(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 17449995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a new bed-side-test assessing conditioned pain modulation: a test-retest reliability study.
    Larsen JB; Madeleine P; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Scand J Pain; 2019 Jul; 19(3):565-574. PubMed ID: 30920956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tender or not tender: test-retest repeatability of pressure pain thresholds in the trapezius and deltoid muscles of healthy women.
    Persson AL; Brogårdh C; Sjölund BH
    J Rehabil Med; 2004 Jan; 36(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 15074434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of 2 protocols for assessing pressure pain threshold in healthy young adults.
    Bisset LM; Evans K; Tuttle N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2015 May; 38(4):282-7. PubMed ID: 25925018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients-The reliability of a pressure algometer.
    Knapstad MK; Nordahl SHG; Naterstad IF; Ask T; Skouen JS; Goplen FK
    Physiother Res Int; 2018 Oct; 23(4):e1736. PubMed ID: 30088327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols.
    Vaegter HB; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Imai Y; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Scand J Pain; 2018 Oct; 18(4):729-737. PubMed ID: 30007061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-retest reliability, repeatability, and sensitivity of an automated deformation-controlled indentation on pressure pain threshold measurement.
    Koo TK; Guo JY; Brown CM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013 Feb; 36(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 23499143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep pain thresholds in the distal limbs of healthy human subjects.
    Rolke R; Andrews Campbell K; Magerl W; Treede RD
    Eur J Pain; 2005 Feb; 9(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15629873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of repeatability of pressure algometry on the neck muscles for clinical use.
    Ylinen J; Nykänen M; Kautiainen H; Häkkinen A
    Man Ther; 2007 May; 12(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 16956783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is One Trial Sufficient to Obtain Excellent Pressure Pain Threshold Reliability in the Low Back of Asymptomatic Individuals? A Test-Retest Study.
    Balaguier R; Madeleine P; Vuillerme N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160866. PubMed ID: 27513474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vaginal pressure-pain thresholds: initial validation and reliability assessment in healthy women.
    Tu FF; Fitzgerald CM; Kuiken T; Farrell T; Norman Harden R
    Clin J Pain; 2008 Jan; 24(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 18180636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical pressure pain threshold testing in neck pain: comparing protocols, responsiveness, and association with psychological variables.
    Walton DM; Levesque L; Payne M; Schick J
    Phys Ther; 2014 Jun; 94(6):827-37. PubMed ID: 24557645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra-session absolute and relative reliability of pressure pain thresholds in the low back region of vine-workers: ffect of the number of trials.
    Balaguier R; Madeleine P; Vuillerme N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Aug; 17(1):350. PubMed ID: 27538914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative and absolute test-retest reliabilities of pressure pain threshold in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
    Srimurugan Pratheep N; Madeleine P; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Scand J Pain; 2018 Apr; 18(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 29794293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Painful conditioning stimuli of the craniofacial region evokes diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in men and women.
    Wang K; Svensson P; Sessle BJ; Cairns BE; Arendt-Nielsen L
    J Orofac Pain; 2010; 24(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 20664826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novice assessors demonstrate good intra-rater agreement and reliability when determining pressure pain thresholds; a cross-sectional study.
    Reezigt RR; Slager GEC; Coppieters MW; Scholten-Peeters GGM
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14565. PubMed ID: 36624753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Within-session test-retest reliability of pressure pain threshold and mechanical temporal summation in healthy subjects.
    Mailloux C; Beaulieu LD; Wideman TH; Massé-Alarie H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245278. PubMed ID: 33434233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of quantitative sensory testing applied to musculoskeletal orofacial region: Site and sex differences.
    Costa YM; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Fiedler LS; de Souza PRJ; Silva LLCP; Ferreira DMAO; Conti PCR; Bonjardim LR
    Eur J Pain; 2019 Jan; 23(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 29989267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation tests for cervical nonorganic signs: a study of face validity.
    Vernon H; Proctor D; Bakalovski D; Moreton J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2010 Jan; 33(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 20114097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.