These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15322643)
1. Morphometric analysis of the effectiveness of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite associated with rotary instrumentation for root canal cleaning. Baratto-Filho F; de Carvalho JR; Fariniuk LF; Sousa-Neto MD; Pécora JD; da Cruz-Filho AM Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 15322643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy. Canoglu H; Tekcicek MU; Cehreli ZC Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 17249433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cleaning of flattened root canals with different irrigating solutions and nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. Arruda MP; Carvalho Junior JR; Miranda CE; Paschoalato C; Silva SR Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(4):284-9. PubMed ID: 20069250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study. Cruz A; Vera J; Gascón G; Palafox-Sánchez CA; Amezcua O; Mercado G J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 25146024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Smear layer production by 3 rotary reamers with different cutting blade designs in straight root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study. Jeon IS; Spångberg LS; Yoon TC; Kazemi RB; Kum KY Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):601-7. PubMed ID: 14600696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ex vivo analysis of the debris remaining in flattened root canals of vital and nonvital teeth after biomechanical preparation with Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Sasaki EW; Versiani MA; Perez DE; Sousa-Neto MD; Silva-Sousa YT; Silva RG Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 17262131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of various concentrations of NaOCl and instrumentation techniques in reducing Enterococcus faecalis within root canals and dentinal tubules. Berber VB; Gomes BP; Sena NT; Vianna ME; Ferraz CC; Zaia AA; Souza-Filho FJ Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 16409323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of different final irrigation protocols in removing debris in flattened root canals. Nadalin MR; Perez DE; Vansan LP; Paschoala C; Souza-Neto MD; Saquy PC Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 19784466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cleaning effectiveness of root canal irrigation with electrochemically activated anolyte and catholyte solutions: a pilot study. Solovyeva AM; Dummer PM Int Endod J; 2000 Nov; 33(6):494-504. PubMed ID: 11307252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study. Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Alvarez Serrano S; Hernandez SR J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 21846548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study. Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infected root dentin reduction. Chuste-Guillot MP; Badet C; Peli JF; Perez F Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 16876071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris. Curtis TO; Sedgley CM J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1261-4. PubMed ID: 22892747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Schäfer E; Schlingemann R Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques. Farid H; Khan FR; Rahman M Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23474581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disinfecting Effects of Rotary Instrumentation with Either 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite or 2% Chlorhexidine as the Main Irrigant: A Randomized Clinical Study. Rôças IN; Provenzano JC; Neves MA; Siqueira JF J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):943-7. PubMed ID: 27142579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Schäfer E; Vlassis M Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of endodontic debris removal as obtained by rotary instrumentation coupled with ultrasonic irrigation. Passarinho-Neto JG; Marchesan MA; Ferreira RB; Silva RG; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD Aust Endod J; 2006 Dec; 32(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 17201755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]