These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15322649)

  • 61. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparison of skeletal changes between female adolescents and adults with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion after orthodontic treatment.
    Ding Y; Zhao JH; Deng JR; Wang XJ
    Chin J Dent Res; 2012; 15(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 23509835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A computerized photographic assessment of the relationship between skeletal discrepancy and mandibular outline asymmetry.
    Good S; Edler R; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 16431897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effects of severity and location of nonsyndromic hypodontia on craniofacial morphology.
    Gungor AY; Turkkahraman H
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):584-90. PubMed ID: 23311600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures.
    Karaman AI
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 12169035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Comparison between rapid and mixed maxillary expansion through an assessment of dento-skeletal effects on posteroanterior cephalometry.
    Perillo L; De Rosa A; Iaselli F; d'Apuzzo F; Grassia V; Cappabianca S
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Jul; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 25139110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach.
    Ko EW; Lin SC; Chen YR; Huang CS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):e215-23. PubMed ID: 23455415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Mandibular symphysis morphology and dimensions in different anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Al Maaitah EF; Abu Alhaija ES; Badran SA
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 23914822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II.
    Meloti AF; Gonçalves Rde C; Silva E; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(4):80-8. PubMed ID: 25279525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Lau JW; Hägg U
    Br Dent J; 1999 Feb; 186(4 Spec No):188-90. PubMed ID: 10205956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of the effects of monoblock and twin-block appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
    Tümer N; Gültan AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):460-8. PubMed ID: 10511676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
    Kerr WJ; Ford I
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Dentocraniofacial morphology of 12 Japanese subjects with unilateral cleft lip and palate with a severe Class III malocclusion: a cephalometric study at the pretreatment stage of surgical orthodontic treatment.
    Tateishi C; Moriyama K; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Nov; 38(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 11681993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Cephalometric determinants of successful functional appliance therapy.
    Patel HP; Moseley HC; Noar JH
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 12401049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A multivariate analysis of the relations between craniofacial structure and occlusion with DiPaolo's quadrilateral measures.
    Meyers DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jul; 102(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 1626531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The compensatory mechanism in high-angle malocclusions: a comparison of subjects in the mixed and permanent dentition.
    Betzenberger D; Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10022181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Components of adult Class III malocclusion.
    Ellis E; McNamara JA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1984 May; 42(5):295-305. PubMed ID: 6585502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.