667 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15324917)
1. The effect of the radial function on I-125 seeds used for permanent prostate implantation.
Pickett B; Pouliot J
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 15324917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.
Mangili P; Stea L; Cattani F; Lappi S; Giglioli F; Calamia E; Ziglio F; Martinelli R; Longobardi B
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr; 71(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15066291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry accuracy as a function of seed localization uncertainty in permanent prostate brachytherapy: increased seed number correlates with less variability in prostate dosimetry.
Su Y; Davis BJ; Furutani KM; Herman MG; Robb RA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3105-19. PubMed ID: 17505092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comprehensive I-125 multi-seed comparison for prostate brachytherapy: dosimetry and visibility analysis.
Al-Qaisieh B; Smith DW; Brearley E; St Clair S; Bownes P
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 17588696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability of prostate brachytherapy pre-implant dosimetry: a multi-institutional analysis.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Wallner KE; Blasko JC; Michalski J; Aronowitz J; Grimm P; Moran BJ; McLaughlin PW; Usher J; Lief JH; Allen ZA
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16344253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isotope selection for permanent prostate implants? An evaluation of 103Pd versus 125I based on radiobiological effectiveness and dosimetry.
Dicker AP; Lin CC; Leeper DB; Waterman FM
Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 May; 18(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 10875458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative real-time planned conformal prostate brachytherapy: post-implantation dosimetric outcome and clinical implications.
Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen GN; Sharma N; Shippy AM; Fridman D; Zaider M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 17692978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of random seed placement error in permanent transperineal prostate seed implant.
Bues M; Holupka EJ; Meskell P; Kaplan ID
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Apr; 79(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16515813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The robustness of dose distributions to displacement and migration of 125I permanent seed implants over a wide range of seed number, activity, and designs.
Beaulieu L; Archambault L; Aubin S; Oral E; Taschereau R; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1298-308. PubMed ID: 15001275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acute genitourinary toxicity after high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: correlation between the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy and the severity of acute genitourinary toxicity.
Akimoto T; Ito K; Saitoh J; Noda SE; Harashima K; Sakurai H; Nakayama Y; Yamamoto T; Suzuki K; Nakano T; Niibe H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 16168838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the precision of seeds deposited as loose seeds versus suture embedded seeds: a randomized trial.
Kaplan ID; Meskell PM; Lieberfarb M; Saltzman B; Berg S; Holupka EJ
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 15110307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Ali I; Algan O; Thompson S; Sindhwani P; Herman T; Cheng CY; Ahmad S
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5595-611. PubMed ID: 19717887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative conformal optimization for transperineal prostate implantation using magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.
Zelefsky MJ; Cohen G; Zakian KL; Dyke J; Koutcher JA; Hricak H; Schwartz L; Zaider M
Cancer J; 2000; 6(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 11038145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 192Ir or 125I prostate brachytherapy as a boost to external beam radiotherapy in locally advanced prostatic cancer: a dosimetric point of view.
Nickers P; Thissen B; Jansen N; Deneufbourg JM
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jan; 78(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16216365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life of patients after permanent prostate brachytherapy in relation to dosimetry.
Van Gellekom MP; Moerland MA; Van Vulpen M; Wijrdeman HK; Battermann JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(3):772-80. PubMed ID: 15964707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?
Potters L; Calugaru E; Jassal A; Presser J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(4):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16682144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose-volume conundrum for response of prostate cancer to brachytherapy: summary dosimetric measures and their relationship to tumor control probability.
D'Souza WD; Thames HD; Kuban DA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 15050335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
