These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15325529)

  • 21. A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate.
    Meikle SF; Steiner CA; Zhang J; Lawrence WL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):751-6. PubMed ID: 15802401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request": was the NIH conference based on a faulty premise?
    Young D
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 16948716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Public health implications of cesarean on demand.
    Plante LA
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2006 Dec; 61(12):807-15. PubMed ID: 17107630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cesarean delivery on request: reproductive consequences.
    Gilliam M
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):257-60. PubMed ID: 17011396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [What should we tell our patient who requires cesarean section?].
    Weiner Z
    Harefuah; 2014 Jun; 153(6):327-8, 367. PubMed ID: 25095604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Wen SW; Rusen ID; Walker M; Liston R; Kramer MS; Baskett T; Heaman M; Liu S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1263-9. PubMed ID: 15507951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Cesarean section on request because of labor pain--bioethical and legal views].
    Frković A; Bosković Z
    Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Mar; 64(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 20653122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes.
    Bloom SL; Leveno KJ; Spong CY; Gilbert S; Hauth JC; Landon MB; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 16816049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
    Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Surgical contraception after cesarean section].
    Tsekov G; Tanchev S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1990; 29(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 2091465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature.
    Gamble JA; Creedy DK
    Birth; 2000 Dec; 27(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 11251511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Elective primary cesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists.
    Wu JM; Hundley AF; Visco AG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Feb; 105(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 15684156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
    Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery.
    Spong CY; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Rouse DJ; Leveno KJ; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Simhan HN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 17906012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
    Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.
    Patel RR; Peters TJ; Murphy DJ;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of timing of elective cesarean section on neonatal resuscitation risk.
    Zanardo V; Simbi KA; Vedovato S; Trevisanuto D
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2004 Nov; 5(6):566-70. PubMed ID: 15530194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery.
    Minkoff H; Powderly KR; Chervenak F; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 103(2):387-92. PubMed ID: 14754712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Results of a well-defined protocol for a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.
    Gonen R; Nisenblat V; Barak S; Tamir A; Ohel G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):240-5. PubMed ID: 16449107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?
    Kazandjian VA; Chaulk CP; Ogunbo S; Wicker K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17286718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.