290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15325864)
1. Misoprostol vs. oxytocin for induction of labor at term.
Nigam A; Singh VK; Dubay P; Pandey K; Bhagoliwal A; Prakash A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Sep; 86(3):398-400. PubMed ID: 15325864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
Mbaluka CM; Kamau K; Karanja JG; Mugo N
East Afr Med J; 2014 Sep; 91(9):303-10. PubMed ID: 26866082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Misoprostol vs. oxytocin for induction of labor.
Elhassan EM; Mirghani OA; Adam I
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Dec; 91(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 16162347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-dose vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal misoprostol for midtrimester labor induction: a randomized trial.
Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Biggio JR; Owen J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1065-70. PubMed ID: 16157113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.
Zeteroglu S; Sahin GH; Sahin HA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16406221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone.
Balci O; Mahmoud AS; Ozdemir S; Acar A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 110(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 20347088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
Culver J; Strauss RA; Brody S; Dorman K; Timlin S; McMahon MJ
Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in Enugu, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial.
Ezechukwu PC; Ugwu EO; Obi SN; Chigbu CO
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Mar; 291(3):537-44. PubMed ID: 25138128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term.
Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Otigbah CM; Howard RJ; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ruptured membranes at term: randomized, double-blind trial of oral misoprostol for labor induction.
Lo JY; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Apr; 101(4):685-9. PubMed ID: 12681871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy.
Kadanali S; Küçüközkan T; Zor N; Kumtepe Y
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1996 Nov; 55(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 8960988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Labor induction with vaginal misoprostol and extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha gel.
Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Lindmark G; Nyström L
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Feb; 76(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 11818106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral misoprostol vs. intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes at term.
Al-Hussaini TK; Abdel-Aal SA; Youssef MA
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jul; 82(1):73-5. PubMed ID: 12834947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
