172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15326041)
1. A phantom approach to find the optimal technical parameters for plain chest radiography.
Vassileva J
Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):648-53. PubMed ID: 15326041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography.
Vassileva J
Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):837-42. PubMed ID: 12381693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of dose reduction in neonatal radiography using specially designed phantoms and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs.
Duggan L; Warren-Forward H; Smith T; Kron T
Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):232-7. PubMed ID: 12711642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of varying X-ray tube voltage and additional filtration on image quality and patient dose in digital radiography system.
E A; A Y; T O
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Sep; 199():110893. PubMed ID: 37321050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger N; Borisch I; Büttner R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A search for improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy.
Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M; Dance DR
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):537-59. PubMed ID: 10070800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography.
Honey ID; Mackenzie A; Evans DS
Br J Radiol; 2005 May; 78(929):422-7. PubMed ID: 15845936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Schemes for the optimization of chest radiography using a computer model of the patient and x-ray imaging system.
Sandborg M; McVey G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 11695764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria.
Lanhede B; Båth M; Kheddache S; Sund P; Björneld L; Widell M; Almén A; Besjakov J; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Panzer W; Zankl M; Månsson LG
Br J Radiol; 2002 Jan; 75(889):38-49. PubMed ID: 11806957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.
Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
