347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15327023)
1. Analytical quality specifications for common reference intervals.
Ricós C; Doménech MV; Perich C
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):858-62. PubMed ID: 15327023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Valid analytical performance specifications for combined analytical bias and imprecision for the use of common reference intervals.
Hyltoft Petersen P; Lund F; Fraser CG; Sandberg S; Sölétormos G
Ann Clin Biochem; 2018 Sep; 55(5):612-615. PubMed ID: 29310466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prerequisites for establishing common reference intervals.
Hyltoft Petersen P; Rustad P
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2004; 64(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 15223695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analytical performance, reference values and decision limits. A need to differentiate between reference intervals and decision limits and to define analytical quality specifications.
Petersen PH; Jensen EA; Brandslund I
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 50(5):819-31. PubMed ID: 22628319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of analytical quality on establishing common reference intervals and their use.
Rustad P; Hyltoft Petersen P
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2004; 64(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 15223703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What information on quality specifications should be communicated to clinicians, and how?
Plebani M
Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 15234633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analytical performance specifications for changes in assay bias (Δbias) for data with logarithmic distributions as assessed by effects on reference change values.
Petersen PH; Lund F; Fraser CG; Sölétormos G
Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 53(6):686-691. PubMed ID: 27147623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposal for the modification of the conventional model for establishing performance specifications.
Oosterhuis WP; Sandberg S
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):925-37. PubMed ID: 25901717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analytical goals for the estimation of non-Gaussian reference intervals.
Hyltoft Petersen P; Gowans EM; Blaabjerg O; Hørder M
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1989 Dec; 49(8):727-37. PubMed ID: 2617130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality indicators and specifications for key processes in clinical laboratories: a preliminary experience.
Kirchner MJ; Funes VA; Adzet CB; Clar MV; Escuer MI; Girona JM; Barellas RM; Alsina CP; Aguilá CR; Isern GT; Navarro CV
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(5):672-7. PubMed ID: 17484633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combination of analytical quality specifications based on biological within- and between-subject variation.
Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Jørgensen L; Brandslund I; Stahl M; Gowans E; Libeer JC; Ricós C
Ann Clin Biochem; 2002 Nov; 39(Pt 6):543-50. PubMed ID: 12564835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analytical performance specifications: relating laboratory performance to quality required for intended clinical use.
Dalenberg DA; Schryver PG; Klee GG
Clin Lab Med; 2013 Mar; 33(1):55-73. PubMed ID: 23331729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can current analytical quality performance of UK clinical laboratories support evidence-based guidelines for diabetes and ischaemic heart disease?--A pilot study and a proposal.
Jassam N; Yundt-Pacheco J; Jansen R; Thomas A; Barth JH
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Aug; 51(8):1579-84. PubMed ID: 23525878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guideline for the production of multicentre physiological reference values using the same measurement system. A proposal of the Catalan Association for Clinical Laboratory Sciences.
Fuentes-Arderiu X; Mas-Serra R; Alumà-Trullàs A; Martí-Marcet MI; Dot-Bach D; ;
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):778-82. PubMed ID: 15327013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expressing analytical performance from multi-sample evaluation in laboratory EQA.
Thelen MHM; Jansen RTP; Weykamp CW; Steigstra H; Meijer R; Cobbaert CM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Aug; 55(10):1509-1516. PubMed ID: 28182577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analytical performance specifications for EQA schemes - need for harmonisation.
Dallas Jones GR
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):919-24. PubMed ID: 25883203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
Rinsho Byori; 2008 Jul; 56(7):617-21. PubMed ID: 18709995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposed quality specifications for the imprecision and inaccuracy of analytical systems for clinical chemistry.
Fraser CG; Petersen PH; Ricos C; Haeckel R
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1992 May; 30(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 1627730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Descriptive analytical data and consequences for calculation of common reference intervals in the Nordic Reference Interval Project 2000.
Rustad P; Felding P; Lahti A; Hyltoft Petersen P
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2004; 64(4):343-70. PubMed ID: 15223700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
