These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15327024)

  • 1. Design of internal quality control for reference value studies.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):863-7. PubMed ID: 15327024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Allowable bias derived from the NOBIDA reference values.
    Åsberg A; Odsæter IH
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2019 Nov; 79(7):533-537. PubMed ID: 31553244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical application of biological variation and Sigma metrics quality models to evaluate 20 chemistry analytes on the Beckman Coulter AU680.
    Tran MT; Hoang K; Greaves RF
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 49(16-17):1259-1266. PubMed ID: 27527571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Internal quality control: planning and implementation strategies.
    Westgard JO
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Nov; 40(Pt 6):593-611. PubMed ID: 14629798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sigma Metric Evaluation of Drugs in a Clinical Laboratory: Importance of Choosing Appropriate Total Allowable Error and a Troubleshooting Roadmap.
    Sharma LK; Datta RR; Sharma N
    J Lab Physicians; 2021 Mar; 13(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 34103878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy controls: assessing trueness (bias).
    Armbruster D
    Clin Lab Med; 2013 Mar; 33(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 23331733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposal for the modification of the conventional model for establishing performance specifications.
    Oosterhuis WP; Sandberg S
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):925-37. PubMed ID: 25901717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient results and laboratory test accuracy.
    Katayev A; Fleming JK
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2014; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 24660519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the analytical quality control of urinary albumin measurements using sigma metrics.
    Wang H; Ma Y; Shan X
    Clin Biochem; 2019 Nov; 73():109-111. PubMed ID: 31351987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance goals for the laboratory testing of antithrombin, protein C and protein S.
    Meijer P; Haverkate F; Kluft C
    Thromb Haemost; 2006 Nov; 96(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 17080214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analytical goals for coagulation tests based on biological variation.
    Wada Y; Kurihara M; Toyofuku M; Kawamura M; Iida H; Kayamori Y; Kinoshita S; Hamasaki N
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004 Jan; 42(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15061385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytical performance characteristics of the T4 method in the Abbott AxSYM immunoassay analyzer.
    Koch DD; Wians FH; Davis D; Burton D
    Clin Lab Sci; 1995; 8(6):327-30. PubMed ID: 10163341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Jul; 56(7):617-21. PubMed ID: 18709995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias in clinical epidemiological study designs.
    Rivas-Ruiz F; Pérez-Vicente S; González-Ramírez AR
    Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2013; 41(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 23036443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods.
    Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analytical goals developed from the inherent error of medical tests.
    Ross JW; Fraser MD
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1481-93; discussion 1493-4. PubMed ID: 8330410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Requirements for reproducibility, trueness and error of measurement in internal quality control schemes.
    Bonvicini P; Metus P; Pavón MA; Tocchini M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 May; 41(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 12812269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of criteria for the evaluation of reference method values.
    Stöckl D; Reinauer H
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1993; 212():16-8. PubMed ID: 8465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.