These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15327736)

  • 1. Increasing the reliability of ipsative interpretations in neuropsychology: a comparison of reliable components analysis and other factor analytic methods.
    Frazier TW; Youngstrom EA; Chelune GJ; Naugle RI; Lineweaver TT
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2004 Jul; 10(4):578-89. PubMed ID: 15327736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliable component analysis of the Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition for 2- to 6-year-olds.
    Caruso JC
    Psychol Assess; 2001 Jun; 13(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 11433801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
    Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B
    Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-individual measures of association in neuropsychology: inferential methods for comparing a single case with a control or normative sample.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Howell DC; Venneri A
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2003 Nov; 9(7):989-1000. PubMed ID: 14738281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regression equations in clinical neuropsychology: an evaluation of statistical methods for comparing predicted and obtained scores.
    Crawford JR; Howell DC
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Oct; 20(5):755-62. PubMed ID: 10079050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia: validation of the Japanese version.
    Kaneda Y; Sumiyoshi T; Keefe R; Ishimoto Y; Numata S; Ohmori T
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 61(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 18081619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A neuropsychological test battery for use in Alzheimer disease clinical trials.
    Harrison J; Minassian SL; Jenkins L; Black RS; Koller M; Grundman M
    Arch Neurol; 2007 Sep; 64(9):1323-9. PubMed ID: 17846273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normative data and psychometric properties for qualitative and quantitative scoring criteria of the Five-point Test.
    Goebel S; Fischer R; Ferstl R; Mehdorn HM
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 23(4):675-90. PubMed ID: 18923969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuropsychological assessment and telemedicine: a preliminary study examining the reliability of neuropsychology services performed via telecommunication.
    Jacobsen SE; Sprenger T; Andersson S; Krogstad JM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2003 Mar; 9(3):472-8. PubMed ID: 12666771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting age-related dual-task effects with individual differences on neuropsychological tests.
    Holtzer R; Stern Y; Rakitin BC
    Neuropsychology; 2005 Jan; 19(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 15656759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cut the coda: early fluency intervals predict diagnoses.
    Fernaeus SE; Ostberg P; Hellström A; Wahlund LO
    Cortex; 2008 Feb; 44(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 18387545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response validity in forensic neuropsychology: exploratory factor analytic evidence of distinct cognitive and psychological constructs.
    Nelson NW; Sweet JJ; Berry DT; Bryant FB; Granacher RP
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 May; 13(3):440-9. PubMed ID: 17445293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion.
    Iverson GL; Lovell MR; Collins MW
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Nov; 17(4):460-7. PubMed ID: 15168911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Victoria Symptom Validity Test performance in acute severe traumatic brain injury: implications for test interpretation.
    Macciocchi SN; Seel RT; Alderson A; Godsall R
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Aug; 21(5):395-404. PubMed ID: 16889930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normative data for determining significance of test-retest differences on eight common neuropsychological instruments.
    Levine AJ; Miller EN; Becker JT; Selnes OA; Cohen BA
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Aug; 18(3):373-84. PubMed ID: 15739809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the reliability and standard errors of measurement of contrast measures from the D-KEFS.
    Crawford JR; Sutherland D; Garthwaite PH
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Nov; 14(6):1069-73. PubMed ID: 18954487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test-retest reliable coefficients and 5-year change scores for the MMSE and 3MS.
    Tombaugh TN
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Jun; 20(4):485-503. PubMed ID: 15896562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How well does IQ predict neuropsychological test performance in normal adults?
    Diaz-Asper CM; Schretlen DJ; Pearlson GD
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2004 Jan; 10(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 14751010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of statistical change criteria used to define significant change in neuropsychological test performance following cardiac surgery.
    Raymond PD; Hinton-Bayre AD; Radel M; Ray MJ; Marsh NA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Jan; 29(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 16337395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability and validity of qualitative scores for the Controlled Oral Word Association Test.
    Ross TP; Calhoun E; Cox T; Wenner C; Kono W; Pleasant M
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 May; 22(4):475-88. PubMed ID: 17317094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.