These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15327848)

  • 1. Source tracking fecal bacteria in water: a critical review of current methods.
    Meays CL; Broersma K; Nordin R; Mazumder A
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Oct; 73(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 15327848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
    Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Mott JB; Vargas M; Dean KE; Di Giovanni GD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fecal source tracking, the indicator paradigm, and managing water quality.
    Field KG; Samadpour M
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3517-38. PubMed ID: 17643471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed.
    Moore DF; Harwood VJ; Ferguson DM; Lukasik J; Hannah P; Getrich M; Brownell M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(3):618-28. PubMed ID: 16108804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State of the art molecular markers for fecal pollution source tracking in water.
    Roslev P; Bukh AS
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Mar; 89(5):1341-55. PubMed ID: 21210102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.
    Harwood VJ; Wiggins B; Hagedorn C; Ellender RD; Gooch J; Kern J; Samadpour M; Chapman AC; Robinson BJ; Thompson BC
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 15382721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of genotypic-based microbial source tracking methods requiring a host origin database.
    Myoda SP; Carson CA; Fuhrmann JJ; Hahm BK; Hartel PG; Yampara-Lquise H; Johnson L; Kuntz RL; Nakatsu CH; Sadowsky MJ; Samadpour M
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):167-80. PubMed ID: 15382722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed.
    Fremaux B; Gritzfeld J; Boa T; Yost CK
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4838-49. PubMed ID: 19604534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quo vadis source tracking? Towards a strategic framework for environmental monitoring of fecal pollution.
    Santo Domingo JW; Bambic DG; Edge TA; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3539-52. PubMed ID: 17632210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools.
    Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM; Lamendella R; Zelt RB; Santo Domingo JW; Walker SR; Oerther DB
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17412907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of ARA and DNA data for microbial source tracking based on source-classification models developed using classification trees.
    Price B; Venso E; Frana M; Greenberg J; Ware A
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3575-84. PubMed ID: 17599384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antibiotic resistance integrons and extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae isolates recovered from chickens and swine in Portugal.
    Machado E; Coque TM; Cantón R; Sousa JC; Peixe L
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Aug; 62(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 18456652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samples.
    Griffith JF; Weisberg SB; McGee CD
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):141-51. PubMed ID: 15382720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of host-specific Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers for assessment of fecal pollution in freshwater.
    Okabe S; Okayama N; Savichtcheva O; Ito T
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 74(4):890-901. PubMed ID: 17139508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Source specific fecal bacteria modeling using soil and water assessment tool model.
    Parajuli PB; Mankin KR; Barnes PL
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(2):953-63. PubMed ID: 18703332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis of bacterial diversity of kefir grains by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and 16S rDNA sequencing].
    Wang YY; Li HR; Jia SF; Wu ZJ; Guo BH
    Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2006 Apr; 46(2):310-3. PubMed ID: 16736598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying human and livestock sources of fecal contamination in Kenya with host-specific Bacteroidales assays.
    Jenkins MW; Tiwari S; Lorente M; Gichaba CM; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4956-66. PubMed ID: 19692107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria.
    Jiang SC; Chu W; Olson BH; He JW; Choi S; Zhang J; Le JY; Gedalanga PB
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 17589839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of ribotyping and antibiotic resistance patterns for identification of host sources of Escherichia coli strains.
    Samadpour M; Roberts MC; Kitts C; Mulugeta W; Alfi D
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2005; 40(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 15613004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deer diet affects ribotype diversity of Escherichia coli for bacterial source tracking.
    Hartel PG; Summer JD; Segars WI
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(13):3263-8. PubMed ID: 14509714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.