These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15328297)

  • 1. Comparison of performance records and national breeding values as input into international genetic evaluation.
    Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2709-19. PubMed ID: 15328297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations.
    Fikse WF; Banos G
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jul; 84(7):1759-67. PubMed ID: 11467826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of international dairy sire evaluations from meta-analysis of national estimated breeding values and direct analysis of individual animal performance records.
    Maltecca C; Bagnato A; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2599-605. PubMed ID: 15328284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genotype x environment interaction for milk production in Guernsey cattle.
    Fikse WF; Rekaya R; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 May; 86(5):1821-7. PubMed ID: 12778593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of an approximate REML algorithm for parameter estimation in a multitrait, multiple across-country evaluation model: a simulation study.
    Tarrés J; Liu Z; Ducrocq V; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4846-55. PubMed ID: 17881708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Bastin C; Soyeurt H; Bormann J; Stoll J; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4604-12. PubMed ID: 19700723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint international evaluation of Milking Shorthorn dairy cattle for production traits.
    Barrett R; Miglior F; Jansen G; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3326-36. PubMed ID: 16107423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prior (co)variances can improve multiple-trait across-country evaluations of weakly linked bull populations.
    Mark T; Madsen P; Jensen J; Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3290-302. PubMed ID: 16107419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multiple-trait herd cluster model for international dairy sire evaluation.
    Weigel KA; Rekaya R
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Apr; 83(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 10791798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applied genetic evaluations for production and functional traits in dairy cattle.
    Mark T
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2641-52. PubMed ID: 15328289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of a multiple-trait, multiple-country genetic evaluation model for female fertility traits.
    Nilforooshan MA; Jakobsen JH; Fikse WF; Berglund B; Jorjani H
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Dec; 93(12):5977-86. PubMed ID: 21094772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective analysis of the accuracy of conversion equations and multiple-trait, across-country evaluations of Holstein bulls used internationally.
    Weigel KA; Powell RL
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 May; 83(5):1081-8. PubMed ID: 10821583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of factors that cause genotype by environment interaction between herds of Holstein cattle in seventeen countries.
    Zwald NR; Weigel KA; Fikse WF; Rekaya R
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Mar; 86(3):1009-18. PubMed ID: 12703638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic evaluation of bulls and cows with single- and multiple-country test-day models.
    Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jun; 85(6):1617-22. PubMed ID: 12146495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data subsetting strategies for estimation of across-country genetic correlations.
    Jorjani H; Emanuelson U; Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Mar; 88(3):1214-24. PubMed ID: 15738255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of time period of data used in international dairy sire evaluations.
    Weigel KA; Banos G
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Dec; 80(12):3425-30. PubMed ID: 9436125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extent and benefits of multi-country progeny testing of young dairy sires.
    Weigel KA; Zwald NR
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 May; 85(5):1339-44. PubMed ID: 12086072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of paternity errors in cow identification on genetic evaluations and international comparisons.
    Banos G; Wiggans GR; Powell RL
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Nov; 84(11):2523-9. PubMed ID: 11768094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Progeny testing and selection intensity for Holstein bulls in different countries.
    Powell RL; Norman HD; Sanders AH
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Oct; 86(10):3386-93. PubMed ID: 14594259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits of cooperation between breeding programs in the presence of genotype by environment interaction.
    Mulder HA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 May; 89(5):1727-39. PubMed ID: 16606744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.