These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15328300)

  • 1. Duration of herd participation in dairy herd improvement milk recording in the United States.
    Hare E; Norman HD; Wright JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2743-7. PubMed ID: 15328300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulated economic effects of improving the sensitivity of a diagnostic test in paratuberculosis control.
    Kudahl AB; Sørensen JT; Nielsen SS; Ostergaard S
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Feb; 78(2):118-29. PubMed ID: 17101188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A demonstration project of interdisciplinary dairy herd extension advising funded by industry and users. 2. Impact on herd performance.
    Peters RR; Cassel EK; Varner MA; Douglass LW; Vough LR; Manspeaker JE; Stewart LE; Wysong JW; Eickelberger RC
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Aug; 77(8):2450-60. PubMed ID: 7962865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consideration of percentage of milk shipped for calculation of total lactation yields from various morning and evening plans of milk sampling.
    Meinert TR; Norman HD; Dickinson FN
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Feb; 79(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 8708090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of milking frequency on DHI performance measures.
    Smith JW; Ely LO; Graves WM; Gilson WD
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3526-33. PubMed ID: 12512627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mortality, culling by sixty days in milk, and production profiles in high- and low-survival Pennsylvania herds.
    Dechow CD; Goodling RC
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Dec; 91(12):4630-9. PubMed ID: 19038939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The association of herd milk production and management with a return-over-feed index in Ontario dairy herds.
    McLaren CJ; Lissemore KD; Duffield TF; Leslie KE; Kelton DF; Grexton B
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jan; 88(1):419-25. PubMed ID: 15591408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usability for genetic evaluations of records from herds participating in progeny test programs of artificial insemination organizations.
    Meinert TR; Norman HD; Mattison JM; Sattler CG
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Oct; 80(10):2599-605. PubMed ID: 9361235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consequence of alternative standards for bulk tank somatic cell count of dairy herds in the United States.
    Norman HD; Lombard JE; Wright JR; Kopral CA; Rodriguez JM; Miller RH
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6243-56. PubMed ID: 22118112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method to analyze production responses in dairy herds.
    Ferguson JD; Beede DK; Shaver RD; Polan CE; Huber JT; Chandler PT
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Jul; 83(7):1530-42. PubMed ID: 10908061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of days dry for United States Holsteins.
    Kuhn MT; Hutchison JL; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Mar; 88(3):1147-55. PubMed ID: 15738248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Body condition scores and dairy form evaluations as indicators of days open in US Holsteins.
    Dechow CD; Rogers GW; Klei L; Lawlor TJ; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3534-41. PubMed ID: 15377633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of test-strategies for estimating probability of low prevalence of paratuberculosis in Danish dairy herds.
    Sergeant ES; Nielsen SS; Toft N
    Prev Vet Med; 2008 Jun; 85(1-2):92-106. PubMed ID: 18336936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Death losses for lactating cows in herds enrolled in dairy herd improvement test plans.
    Miller RH; Kuhn MT; Norman HD; Wright JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3710-5. PubMed ID: 18765630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Milk quality assurance for paratuberculosis: simulation of within-herd infection dynamics and economics.
    Weber MF; Nielen M; Velthuis AG; van Roermund HJ
    Vet Res; 2008; 39(2):12. PubMed ID: 18258169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genotype by environment interaction for production traits while accounting for heteroscedasticity.
    Fahey AG; Schutz MM; Lofgren DL; Schinckel AP; Stewart TS
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3889-99. PubMed ID: 17639000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical evaluation of factors and interactions affecting dairy herd improvement milk urea nitrogen in commercial midwest dairy herds.
    Wattiaux MA; Nordheim EV; Crump P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Aug; 88(8):3020-35. PubMed ID: 16027216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Records contributing to national genetic evaluations by year, registration status, herd size, and region.
    Meinert TR; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 May; 77(5):1466-76. PubMed ID: 8046086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dairy management practices associated with incidence rate of clinical mastitis in low somatic cell score herds in France.
    Barnouin J; Bord S; Bazin S; Chassagne M
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Oct; 88(10):3700-9. PubMed ID: 16162545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.