These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15329386)

  • 1. Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions.
    Tzeng YH; Pan R; Li WH
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Dec; 21(12):2290-8. PubMed ID: 15329386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computing Ka and Ks with a consideration of unequal transitional substitutions.
    Zhang Z; Li J; Yu J
    BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Jun; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16740169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards realistic codon models: among site variability and dependency of synonymous and non-synonymous rates.
    Mayrose I; Doron-Faigenboim A; Bacharach E; Pupko T
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i319-27. PubMed ID: 17646313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Large-scale analyses of synonymous substitution rates can be sensitive to assumptions about the process of mutation.
    Aris-Brosou S; Bielawski JP
    Gene; 2006 Aug; 378():58-64. PubMed ID: 16797879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An empirical codon model for protein sequence evolution.
    Kosiol C; Holmes I; Goldman N
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jul; 24(7):1464-79. PubMed ID: 17400572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution.
    Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Synonymous substitutions substantially improve evolutionary inference from highly diverged proteins.
    Seo TK; Kishino H
    Syst Biol; 2008 Jun; 57(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 18570032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian model comparison approach to inferring positive selection.
    Scheffler K; Seoighe C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 16120799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating absolute rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution in order to characterize natural selection and date species divergences.
    Seo TK; Kishino H; Thorne JL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1201-13. PubMed ID: 15014159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the effect of CpG hypermutability on human codon substitution.
    Misawa K; Kikuno RF
    Gene; 2009 Feb; 431(1-2):18-22. PubMed ID: 19059467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A combined empirical and mechanistic codon model.
    Doron-Faigenboim A; Pupko T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 17110464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution of prokaryotic DNA: intragenic and extragenic divergences observed with orthologs from three related species.
    Fuglsang A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jun; 21(6):1152-9. PubMed ID: 15044593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Codon substitution models based on residue similarity and their applications.
    Liu X; Liu H; Guo W; Yu K
    Gene; 2012 Nov; 509(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 22902303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The comparative method rules! Codon volatility cannot detect positive Darwinian selection using a single genome sequence.
    Dagan T; Graur D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 15525696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation in the pattern of synonymous and nonsynonymous difference between two fungal genomes.
    Hughes AL; Friedman R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1320-4. PubMed ID: 15746015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical codon substitution matrix.
    Schneider A; Cannarozzi GM; Gonnet GH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 6():134. PubMed ID: 15927081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila.
    Comeron JM; Guthrie TB
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2519-30. PubMed ID: 16120803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of methods for estimating the transition:transversion ratio from DNA sequences.
    Kristina Strandberg AK; Salter LA
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Aug; 32(2):495-503. PubMed ID: 15223032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A rationale for the symmetries by base substitutions of degeneracy in the genetic code.
    Jestin JL
    Biosystems; 2010 Jan; 99(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19699257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of six methods for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates.
    Zhang Z; Yu J
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 4(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 17127215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.