124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15329745)
1. Non extraction short-term arch changes.
Ferro F; Perillo L; Ferro A
Prog Orthod; 2004; 5():18-43. PubMed ID: 15329745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distal movement of buccal segments with the "en masse" removable appliance: its value in treating patients with mild Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Part II: the model measuring system and results.
Orton HS; Battagel JM; Ferguson R; Ferman AM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 8638579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of a three-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
Uçem TT; Yüksel S; Okay C; Gülşen A
Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 10920561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of long-term stability of maxillary dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a transpalatal arch followed by fixed appliances.
Raucci G; Elyasi M; Pachêco-Pereira C; Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():24. PubMed ID: 26215180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular arch perimeter changes with lip bumper treatment.
Osborn WS; Nanda RS; Currier GF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Jun; 99(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 2038972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Sifakakis I; Makou M; Eliades T
Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20575202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dental arch dimensions in Class II division 1 malocclusions with mandibular deficiency.
da Silva Filho OG; Ferrari Júnior FM; Okada Ozawa T
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):466-74. PubMed ID: 18416613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA; Tollaro I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 May; 111(5):502-9. PubMed ID: 9155809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early treatment with a maxillary lip bumper-bite plateau combination.
Korn M; Melsen B
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):838-46. PubMed ID: 18298223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study between lip bumper and headgear as maxillary molar retainers following distalization.
Silva RG; Kaieda AK; Paranhos LR; Angelieri F; Torres FC; Scanavini MA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(3):29-34. PubMed ID: 23094556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance on the dental arches and arch relationships: a biometric study.
Hansen K; Iemamnueisuk P; Pancherz H
Br J Orthod; 1995 May; 22(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 7640251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Elastic activator appliances: Bimler's elastic appliance and Klammt's elastic activator].
Solano Reina E
Orthod Fr; 1992; 63 Pt 2():373-80. PubMed ID: 1341726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary arch changes with transpalatal arch treatment followed by full fixed appliances.
Raucci G; Pachêco-Pereira C; Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):683-9. PubMed ID: 25286341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional appliances and arch width.
Gibbs SL; Hunt NP
Br J Orthod; 1992 May; 19(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 1627522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of postretention stability of mandibular dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a lip bumper during mixed dentition followed by fixed appliances.
Raucci G; Pachêco-Pereira C; Elyasi M; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Angle Orthod; 2017 Mar; 87(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 27654628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alignment of a buccally displaced maxillary canine in the late mixed dentition with a modified utility arch: a patient report.
Leonardi R; Licciardello V; Greco M; Rossetti B; Barbato E
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20552106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances: a long-term evaluation of changes in arch dimensions.
McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Herberger TA
Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):344-53. PubMed ID: 12940553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of the lingual arch in the mixed dentition to resolve incisor crowding.
Brennan MM; Gianelly AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 10629524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors influencing molar relationship behavior in the mixed dentition.
Barros SE; Chiqueto K; Janson G; Ferreira E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Nov; 148(5):782-92. PubMed ID: 26522038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
