145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15329914)
1. An academic health center cost analysis of screening mammography: creating a financially viable service.
Chen SL; Clark S; Pierce LJ; Hayes DF; Helvie MA; Greeno PL; Newman LA; Chang AE
Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 15329914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pattern of use and health care system costs.
Olivotto IA; Kan L; Mates D; King S
CMAJ; 1999 Feb; 160(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 10065075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A workplace breast cancer screening program. Costs and components.
Schrammel P; Griffiths RI; Griffiths CB
AAOHN J; 1998 Nov; 46(11):523-9. PubMed ID: 9934000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The costs of mammography screening in New Zealand: evidence from the pilot programmes.
Menon A; Devlin NJ; Richardson AK
N Z Med J; 1994 Dec; 107(991):501-3. PubMed ID: 7830979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost analysis of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: selected states, 2003 to 2004.
Ekwueme DU; Gardner JG; Subramanian S; Tangka FK; Bapat B; Richardson LC
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(3):626-35. PubMed ID: 18157831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of the costs of mammographic screening program in the city of Florence].
Spagnolo G; Zappa M; Paci E; Giorgi D; Rosselli del Turco M
Epidemiol Prev; 1995 Dec; 19(65):330-7. PubMed ID: 8852082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Providing professional mammography services: financial analysis.
Enzmann DR; Anglada PM; Haviley C; Venta LA
Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):467-73. PubMed ID: 11323474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study.
Gerard K; Salkeld G; Hall J
Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(9):466, 469-71. PubMed ID: 2381337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Economic evaluation of the new national breast cancer screening programme in France: application to the Bouche-du-Rhone district].
Giorgi R; Reynaud J; Wait S; Seradour B
Bull Cancer; 2005 Nov; 92(11):995-1001. PubMed ID: 16316834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cost analysis of a mammographic screening program].
Vanara F; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Segnan N
Epidemiol Prev; 1995 Dec; 19(65):318-29. PubMed ID: 8852081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cost of health care services provided to women enrolled in a community-based breast and cervical cancer screening program.
Burack R; Latafa J
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2009 Aug; 20(3):713-20. PubMed ID: 19648699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
Bick U
Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A screening mammography program. Staying alive and making it work.
Monsees BS; Destouet JM
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):211-9. PubMed ID: 1732928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences.
Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):924-30. PubMed ID: 24295942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing and testing a cost-assessment tool for cancer screening programs.
Subramanian S; Ekwueme DU; Gardner JG; Trogdon J
Am J Prev Med; 2009 Sep; 37(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 19666160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic value of orthopaedic trauma: the (second to) bottom line.
Ziran BH; Barrette-Grischow MK; Marucci K
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Apr; 22(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 18404030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic analysis of outreach assessment clinics in breast screening programmes.
van der Pol MM; Cairns JA; Gilbert FJ; Hendry PJ
Int J Health Plann Manage; 1999; 14(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 10351680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
