These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1533063)
1. Reliability problems associated with the modified Schöber technique for true lumbar flexion measurement. Miller SA; Mayer T; Cox R; Gatchel RJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1992 Mar; 17(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 1533063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion. Bedekar N; Suryawanshi M; Rairikar S; Sancheti P; Shyam A J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2014; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 24029833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spinal range of motion. Accuracy and sources of error with inclinometric measurement. Mayer TG; Kondraske G; Beals SB; Gatchel RJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Sep; 22(17):1976-84. PubMed ID: 9306526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of the modified-modified Schöber and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension. Williams R; Binkley J; Bloch R; Goldsmith CH; Minuk T Phys Ther; 1993 Jan; 73(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 8417457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications. Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and reliability of the metric measurements in the assessment of lumbar spine motion in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rezvani A; Ergin O; Karacan I; Oncu M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1189-96. PubMed ID: 22614802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of quality measures of movement in lumbar spine flexion-extension radiography. Taghipour-Darzi M; Ebrahimi-Takamjani E; Salavati M; Mobini B; Zekavat H J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2009; 22(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 20023344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between flexibility and EMG activity pattern of the erector spinae muscles during trunk flexion-extension. Hashemirad F; Talebian S; Hatef B; Kahlaee AH J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Oct; 19(5):746-53. PubMed ID: 18400517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of normal lumbar flexion with surface inclinometry. A comparison of three methods. Rondinelli R; Murphy J; Esler A; Marciano T; Cholmakjian C Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Aug; 71(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 1642821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessments of lumbar flexion range of motion: intertester reliability and concurrent validity of 2 commonly used clinical tests. Robinson HS; Mengshoel AM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):E270-5. PubMed ID: 24253798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of a single, digital inclinometric range of motion measurement technique in the assessment of lumbar range of motion. Stude DE; Goertz C; Gallinger M J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Feb; 17(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 8169547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skin distraction at select landmarks on the spine midline in the upright and fully flexed postures. Moga PJ J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2010 Jan; 14(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 20006284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry measurements of lumbar flexion and extension. MacDermid JC; Arumugam V; Vincent JI; Payne KL; So AK BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 May; 16():121. PubMed ID: 25989834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of dual inclinometer for lumbar range of motion using two different Landmarking techniques. Ahmed I; Mohseni Bandpei MA; Gilani SA; Ahmad A; Zaidi F J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Oct; 72(10):1994-1997. PubMed ID: 36660987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interexaminer reliability and discriminant validity of inclinometric measurement of lumbar rotation in chronic low-back pain patients and subjects without low-back pain. Boline PD; Keating JC; Haas M; Anderson AV Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1992 Mar; 17(3):335-8. PubMed ID: 1533062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of segmental lumbar spine flexion and extension using ultrasound imaging. Chleboun GS; Amway MJ; Hill JG; Root KJ; Murray HC; Sergeev AV J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Oct; 42(10):880-5. PubMed ID: 22814284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and reliability of skin markers for measurement of intersegmental mobility at L2-3 and L3-4 during lateral bending in healthy individuals: a fluoroscopy study. Hashemirad F; Hatef B; Jaberzadeh S; Ale Agha N J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2013 Jan; 17(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 23294683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Two Handheld Digital Dual Inclinometry Techniques in the Measurement of Lumbar Flexion Active Range of Motion. Fletcher JP; Taylor JD; Carroll CA; Richardson MB J Sport Rehabil; 2020 Jun; 30(2):339-342. PubMed ID: 32521510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of passive physiological accessory movement assessment of lumbar spine in novice manual therapists. Deore M; May S J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2012 Jul; 16(3):289-293. PubMed ID: 22703738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Validity and reliability of Spinal Mouse to assess lumbar flexion]. Guermazi M; Ghroubi S; Kassis M; Jaziri O; Keskes H; Kessomtini W; Ben Hammouda I; Elleuch MH Ann Readapt Med Phys; 2006 May; 49(4):172-7. PubMed ID: 16630669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]