These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15330710)

  • 1. Prior depth information can bias motion perception.
    Graf EW; Adams WJ; Lages M
    J Vis; 2004 May; 4(6):427-33. PubMed ID: 15330710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Occlusion and the solution to visual motion ambiguity: Looking beyond the aperture problem.
    van der Smagt MJ; Stoner GR
    J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):4.1-12. PubMed ID: 18318630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stereoscopic occlusion and the aperture problem for motion: a new solution.
    Anderson BL
    Vision Res; 1999 Apr; 39(7):1273-84. PubMed ID: 10343841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cyclopean (stereoscopic) barber pole illusion.
    Patterson R; Bowd C; Donnelly M
    Vision Res; 1998 Jul; 38(14):2119-25. PubMed ID: 9797972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monocular occlusion cues alter the influence of terminator motion in the barber pole phenomenon.
    Lidén L; Mingolla E
    Vision Res; 1998 Dec; 38(24):3883-98. PubMed ID: 10211381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The extrinsic/intrinsic classification of two-dimensional motion signals with barber-pole stimuli.
    Castet E; Charton V; Dufour A
    Vision Res; 1999 Mar; 39(5):915-32. PubMed ID: 10341945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion.
    Shimojo S; Silverman GH; Nakayama K
    Vision Res; 1989; 29(5):619-26. PubMed ID: 2603398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Matching perceived depth from disparity and from velocity: Modeling and psychophysics.
    Domini F; Caudek C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 19963200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of depth, eccentricity and size of additional static stimulus on visually induced self-motion perception.
    Nakamura S
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(15):2344-53. PubMed ID: 16516260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Context and the motion aftereffect: occlusion cues in the test pattern alter perceived direction.
    van der Smagt M; Stoner GR
    Perception; 2002; 31(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 11922121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occlusion and the perception of coherent motion.
    Vallortigara G; Bressan P
    Vision Res; 1991; 31(11):1967-78. PubMed ID: 1771780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal combination of form and motion cues in human heading perception.
    Niehorster DC; Cheng JC; Li L
    J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):20. PubMed ID: 20884515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of a disparity pattern on the perception of direction: non-retinal information masks retinal information.
    Ishii M
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1563-8. PubMed ID: 19324065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the kinetic Zollner illusion to quantify the interaction between form and motion information in depth.
    Khuu SK; Kim DD
    Vision Res; 2013 May; 83():48-55. PubMed ID: 23474298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stereoscopic matching and the aperture problem.
    van Dam LC; van Ee R
    Perception; 2004; 33(7):769-87. PubMed ID: 15460506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-motion perception from expanding and contracting optical flows overlapped with binocular disparity.
    Ito H; Shibata I
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 15610745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motion distorts perceived depth.
    Edwards M; Badcock DR
    Vision Res; 2003 Aug; 43(17):1799-804. PubMed ID: 12826103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dichoptic motion perception limited to depth of fixation?
    Lages M; Dolia A; Graf EW
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 17112562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stereo and motion disparities interfere with positional averaging.
    Harris JM; Morgan MJ
    Vision Res; 1993 Feb; 33(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 8447103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The stroboscopic Pulfrich effect is not evidence for the joint encoding of motion and depth.
    Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Vis; 2005 May; 5(5):417-34. PubMed ID: 16097873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.