190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15330901)
1. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures: has FISH found a new pond?
Wamsteker EJ; Anderson MA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1682-3. PubMed ID: 15330901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma in indeterminate biliary strictures.
Liew ZH; Loh TJ; Lim TKH; Lim TH; Khor CJL; Mesenas SJ; Kong CSC; Ong WC; Tan DMY
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Jan; 33(1):315-319. PubMed ID: 28543841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic utility of peroral cholangioscopy for various bile-duct lesions.
Fukuda Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Sakai Y; Tsuchiya S; Saisyo H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Sep; 62(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 16111955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polysomy and p16 deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures.
Gonda TA; Glick MP; Sethi A; Poneros JM; Palmas W; Iqbal S; Gonzalez S; Nandula SV; Emond JC; Brown RS; Murty VV; Stevens PD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 22100297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endobiliary brush cytology during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in patients with obstructive jaundice.
Xing GS; Geng JC; Han XW; Dai JH; Wu CY
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 Feb; 4(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15730930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond cytomorphology: expanding the diagnostic potential for biliary cytology.
Chadwick BE
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Jun; 40(6):536-41. PubMed ID: 22619128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic transpapillary biopsy for diagnosis of patients with pancreaticobiliary ductal strictures.
Kubota Y; Takaoka M; Tani K; Ogura M; Kin H; Fujimura K; Mizuno T; Inoue K
Am J Gastroenterol; 1993 Oct; 88(10):1700-4. PubMed ID: 8213710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective, blinded assessment of factors influencing the accuracy of biliary cytology interpretation.
Harewood GC; Baron TH; Stadheim LM; Kipp BR; Sebo TJ; Salomao DR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Aug; 99(8):1464-9. PubMed ID: 15307861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Confocal endomicroscopy.
Meining A
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2009 Oct; 19(4):629-35. PubMed ID: 19917468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In situ hybridization for telomerase RNA in routine cytologic brushings for the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancies.
Morales CP; Burdick JS; Saboorian MH; Wright WE; Shay JW
Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Oct; 48(4):402-5. PubMed ID: 9786114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multivariable model using advanced cytologic methods for the evaluation of indeterminate pancreatobiliary strictures.
Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Halling KC; Oberg TN; Bryant SC; Tarrell RF; Gores GJ; Levy MJ; Clayton AC; Sebo TJ; Roberts LR
Gastroenterology; 2009 Jun; 136(7):2180-6. PubMed ID: 19232347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraductal aspiration: a promising new tissue-sampling technique for the diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures.
Curcio G; Traina M; Mocciaro F; Liotta R; Gentile R; Tarantino I; Barresi L; Granata A; Tuzzolino F; Gridelli B
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):798-804. PubMed ID: 22301344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of endoscopic wire guided biliary brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures.
Sachdev A; Duseja A; Bhalla A; Handa U; Sandhu BS; Gupta V; Kochhar S
Trop Gastroenterol; 2003; 24(4):215-7. PubMed ID: 15164539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable.
Eiholm S; Thielsen P; Kromann-Andersen H
Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4656. PubMed ID: 23809967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive factors for positive diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures by transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.
Naitoh I; Nakazawa T; Kato A; Hayashi K; Miyabe K; Shimizu S; Kondo H; Nishi Y; Yoshida M; Umemura S; Hori Y; Kuno T; Takahashi S; Ohara H; Joh T
J Dig Dis; 2016 Jan; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26717051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
