These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15331035)

  • 1. Self-esteem, interpersonal risk, and preference for e-mail to face-to-face communication.
    Joinson AN
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2004 Aug; 7(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 15331035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Media preferences in scenarios involving relationship closeness and information valence: evidence of strategic self-presentation and sex differences.
    Johnsen JA; Kummervold PE; Wynn R
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Feb; 114(1):217-30. PubMed ID: 24765722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of emotional intelligence, self-esteem, and self-image on romantic communication over MySpace.
    Dong Q; Urista MA; Gundrum D
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2008 Oct; 11(5):577-8. PubMed ID: 18817483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Taking chances in the face of threat: romantic risk regulation and approach motivation.
    Cavallo JV; Fitzsimons GM; Holmes JG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):737-51. PubMed ID: 19307432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does self-threat promote social connection? The role of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth.
    Park LE; Maner JK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):203-17. PubMed ID: 19210075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of self-esteem on social interactions during the Ultimatum Game.
    Paz V; Nicolaisen-Sobesky E; Collado E; Horta S; Rey C; Rivero M; Berriolo P; Díaz M; Otón M; Pérez A; Fernández-Theoduloz G; Cabana Á; Gradin VB
    Psychiatry Res; 2017 Jun; 252():247-255. PubMed ID: 28285253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Secure versus fragile high self-esteem as a predictor of verbal defensiveness: converging findings across three different markers.
    Kernis MH; Lakey CE; Heppner WL
    J Pers; 2008 Jun; 76(3):477-512. PubMed ID: 18447858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gratifications, collective self-esteem, online emotional openness, and traitlike communication apprehension as predictors of Facebook uses.
    Zhang Y; Tang LS; Leung L
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2011 Dec; 14(12):733-9. PubMed ID: 21651417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-esteem moderates neuroendocrine and psychological responses to interpersonal rejection.
    Ford MB; Collins NL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Mar; 98(3):405-19. PubMed ID: 20175621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Internet use and e-mail communications between patients and providers: a survey of rheumatology outpatients.
    Siva C; Smarr KL; Hanson KD; Parikh M; Lawlor K; Ge B
    J Clin Rheumatol; 2008 Dec; 14(6):318-23. PubMed ID: 19033871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interpersonal consequences of inflated self-esteem in an inpatient psychiatric youth sample.
    Perez M; Pettit JW; David CF; Kistner JA; Joiner TE
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2001 Aug; 69(4):712-6. PubMed ID: 11550738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The finer points of lying online: e-mail versus pen and paper.
    Naquin CE; Kurtzberg TR; Belkin LY
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Mar; 95(2):387-94. PubMed ID: 20230078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls.
    Pea R; Nass C; Meheula L; Rance M; Kumar A; Bamford H; Nass M; Simha A; Stillerman B; Yang S; Zhou M
    Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 48(2):327-36. PubMed ID: 22268607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face-to-face or not-to-face: A technology preference for communication.
    Jaafar NI; Darmawan B; Mohamed Ariffin MY
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2014 Nov; 17(11):702-8. PubMed ID: 25405782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived regard explains self- esteem differences in expressivity.
    Gaucher D; Wood JV; Stinson DA; Forest AL; Holmes JG; Logel C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1144-56. PubMed ID: 22711742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Engagement and satisfaction with an Internet-based physical activity intervention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    van den Berg MH; Ronday HK; Peeters AJ; Voogt-van der Harst EM; Munneke M; Breedveld FC; Vliet Vlieland TP
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2007 Mar; 46(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 17043050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of self-esteem in affiliation.
    Astra RL; Singg S
    J Psychol; 2000 Jan; 134(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10654843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-esteem and organization of valenced information about others: the "Jekyll and Hyde"-ing of relationship partners.
    Graham SM; Clark MS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):652-65. PubMed ID: 16649861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When rejection stings: how self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes.
    Murray SL; Rose P; Bellavia GM; Holmes JG; Kusche AG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Sep; 83(3):556-73. PubMed ID: 12219854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding health care communication preferences of veteran primary care users.
    LaVela SL; Schectman G; Gering J; Locatelli SM; Gawron A; Weaver FM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Sep; 88(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 22766452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.