129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15331491)
1. Man wins battle to keep receiving life support: pro-choice living wills are essential.
Irwin MH
BMJ; 2004 Aug; 329(7464):515. PubMed ID: 15331491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Man wins battle to keep receiving life support.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2004 Aug; 329(7461):309. PubMed ID: 15297329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Man wins battle to keep receiving life support: doctors must always give patients best possible care.
Anthony-Pillai R
BMJ; 2004 Aug; 329(7464):515. PubMed ID: 15331492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Revising Iowa's Life-sustaining Procedures Act: creating a practical guide to living wills in Iowa.
Goldman CP
Iowa Law Rev; 1991 Jul; 76(5):1137-78. PubMed ID: 16134268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legislating advance directives for the terminally ill: the living will and durable power of attorney.
Martyn SR; Jacobs LB
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):779-809. PubMed ID: 16041874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
Dyke MC
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.
Hunt WE
Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Legal revisions in the area of assisted death].
Verrel T
Chirurg; 1996 Jun; 67(6):Suppl 133-6. PubMed ID: 8767095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Enforcement problems arising from conflicting views of living wills in the legal, medical and patient communities.
Webster P
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2001; 62(4):793-813. PubMed ID: 12774779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Indiana's Living Wills and Life-Prolonging Procedures Act: a reform proposal.
Mooney CA
Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(2):539-58. PubMed ID: 11649962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Why use medical science to keep people alive when they would prefer to die?
Angeles P
Sci Forum; 1977 Jun; 10(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 11650576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. California's 'Natural Death Act'.
Lawson HG
Wall St J (East Ed); 1976 Dec; ():6. PubMed ID: 11649046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The problem of euthanasia.
Rudikoff S
Commentary; 1974 Feb; 57(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 11662134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal regulation of terminal care: options and obstacles.
Winslade WJ
Tex Med; 1991 Feb; 87(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 2031233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal myths about terminating life support.
Meisel A
Arch Intern Med; 1991 Aug; 151(8):1497-502. PubMed ID: 1908215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. After the Cruzan case: uniform legislation available to help preserve rights of the terminally ill.
Hawaii Med J; 1990 Oct; 49(10):375. PubMed ID: 2272806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Ray.
Avila D
Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 8354628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Euthanasia and the law.
Campbell T
Alta Law Rev; 1979; 17(2):188-209. PubMed ID: 11662771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The "living will": the right to death with dignity?
Strand JG
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1976; 26(2):485-526. PubMed ID: 11661320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
