127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15333272)
1. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
Webb R; Richardson J; Pickles A
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uptake for cervical screening by ethnicity and place-of-birth: a population-based cross-sectional study.
Webb R; Richardson J; Esmail A; Pickles A
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Sep; 26(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 15454600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the effects of population mobility on cervical screening coverage.
Millett C; Bardsley M; Binysh K
Public Health; 2002 Nov; 116(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 12407475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer risk factors and predictors of cervical dysplasia among women in south-west Nigeria.
Ogunbowale T; Lawoyin TO
Aust J Rural Health; 2008 Dec; 16(6):338-42. PubMed ID: 19032205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.
Chew-Graham C; Mole E; Evans LJ; Rogers A
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15964735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Socio-economic and demographic determinants affecting participation in the Swedish cervical screening program: A population-based case-control study.
Broberg G; Wang J; Östberg AL; Adolfsson A; Nemes S; Sparén P; Strander B
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190171. PubMed ID: 29320536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Participation in highly subsidized cervical cancer screening by women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.
Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Nwokocha AR; Waboso PA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17464818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors and effectiveness of diabetes self-management education in clinical practice.
Shah BR; Booth GL
Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Jan; 74(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18805668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cluster-randomised trial of risk communication to enhance informed uptake of cervical screening.
Holloway RM; Wilkinson C; Peters TJ; Russell I; Cohen D; Hale J; Rogers C; Lewis H
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Aug; 53(493):620-5. PubMed ID: 14601338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Matching dental practice board data to the health authority population register.
Tickle M; Hayhurst G; Moulding G; Jenner T; Blinkhorn A
Community Dent Health; 2001 Mar; 18(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11421404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary care factors associated with cervical screening coverage in England.
Bang JY; Yadegarfar G; Soljak M; Majeed A
J Public Health (Oxf); 2012 Dec; 34(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 22518028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Opportunistic cervical screening at a sexual health clinic.
Treacy A; Lyons F; Mulcahy F
Ir Med J; 2006; 99(7):198-9. PubMed ID: 16986561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understanding patient-initiated frequent attendance in primary care: a case-control study.
Báez K; Aiarzaguena JM; Grandes G; Pedrero E; Aranguren J; Retolaza A
Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Dec; 48(437):1824-7. PubMed ID: 10198500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeat attenders at National Health Service walk-in centres - a descriptive study using routine data.
Maheswaran R; Pearson T; Jiwa M
Public Health; 2009 Jul; 123(7):506-10. PubMed ID: 19604528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
