These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15333376)

  • 1. Safety and MRI artifact evaluation at 1.5 T of metallic mounting sheath of a marking clip inadvertently deployed at stereotactic biopsy.
    Lanners DM; Amrami KK; Jonsgaard RS; Gisvold JJ; Felmlee JP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3):825-9. PubMed ID: 15333376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of a collagen-plug biopsy site marking device deployed after stereotactic core needle breast biopsy.
    Rosen EL; Baker JA; Soo MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Nov; 181(5):1295-9. PubMed ID: 14573422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Titanium vs carbon coated ceramic breast tissue marker clips: 3T MR susceptibility artifact and local signal disturbance.
    Ghate SV; Baker JA; Hawkins AD; Soher BJ
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jun; 18(6):770-3. PubMed ID: 21419666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects on breast MRI of artifacts caused by metallic tissue marker clips.
    Genson CC; Blane CE; Helvie MA; Waits SA; Chenevert TL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 17242244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metallic marking clips used after stereotactic breast biopsy: ex vivo testing of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with MR imaging.
    Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1417-9. PubMed ID: 10227529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current opinion on clip placement after breast biopsy: a survey of practising radiologists in France and Quebec.
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Chopier J; Tardivon A; Trop I
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Jul; 68(7):e378-83. PubMed ID: 23522486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [MRI safety aspects and artifacts of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale occluders at 1.5 tesla: a phantom study].
    Bock M; Mohrs OK; Voigtlaender T; Kauczor HU; Semmler W
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):272-7. PubMed ID: 16508833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Artifacts from dental metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging].
    Cao Z; Chen LL; Gong XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(26):1855-8. PubMed ID: 19040024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative loss of core biopsy clips: clinical implications.
    Calhoun K; Giuliano A; Brenner RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Mar; 190(3):W196-200. PubMed ID: 18287412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aneurysm clip testing for ferromagnetic properties: clip variability issues.
    Kanal E; Shellock FG; Lewin JS
    Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):576-8. PubMed ID: 8685361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical external immobilization devices: evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging issues at 3.0 Tesla.
    Diaz FL; Tweardy L; Shellock FG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 20110847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience.
    Liberman L; Bracero N; Morris E; Thornton C; Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 15972421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Performance of a newly developed clip (Tumark Professional) for MRI-guided lesion localization after MRI-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy--first results].
    Siegmann KC; Speck S; Baur A; Hahn M; Stäbler A; Hornscheidt D; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 2009 Feb; 181(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 19137493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new artifact-free device for frameless, magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic procedures.
    Bernays RL; Kollias SS; Khan N; Romanowski B; Yonekawa Y
    Neurosurgery; 2000 Jan; 46(1):112-6; discussion 116-7. PubMed ID: 10626942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marker clip placement following directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
    Reynolds HE
    Am Surg; 1999 Jan; 65(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 9915534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR-guided stereotactic breast biopsy: technical aspects and preliminary results.
    Panizza P; De Cobelli F; De Gaspari A; Gusmini S; Zanello A; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 2003 Sep; 106(3):232-44. PubMed ID: 14612844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters.
    Olsrud J; Lätt J; Brockstedt S; Romner B; Björkman-Burtscher IM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 16104008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimizing ferromagnetic artefact with metallic lumbar total disc arthroplasty devices at adjacent segments: technical note.
    Marshman LA; Strong G; Trewhella M; Kasis A; Friesem T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 20081522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of magnetic resonance safety of veterinary radiofrequency identification devices at 1 T.
    Baker MA; MacDonald I
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 21388467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Functional capacity of MRI-compatible biopsy needles in comparison with ferromagnetic biopsy needles. In vitro studies].
    Langen HJ; Kugel H; Ortmann M; Noack M; de Rochemont RM; Landwehr P
    Rofo; 2001 Jul; 173(7):658-62. PubMed ID: 11512240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.