These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15333376)

  • 21. Design, construction and evaluation of an anthropomorphic head phantom with realistic susceptibility artifacts.
    Shmueli K; Thomas DL; Ordidge RJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(1):202-7. PubMed ID: 17659546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of MRI issues for the Argus II retinal prosthesis.
    Weiland JD; Faraji B; Greenberg RJ; Humayun MS; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 22260934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [New method of MR-guided mammary biopsy].
    Thiele J; Schneider JP; Franke P; Lieberenz S; Schmidt F
    Rofo; 1998 Apr; 168(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 9589101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radio frequency versus susceptibility effects of small conductive implants--a systematic MRI study on aneurysm clips at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Lauer UA; Graf H; Berger A; Claussen CD; Schick F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 15919602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Magnetic resonance compatibility of intraocular lenses measured at 7 Tesla.
    van Rijn GA; Mourik JE; Teeuwisse WM; Luyten GP; Webb AG
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 53(7):3449-53. PubMed ID: 22538424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Metallic artifact in MRI after removal of orthopedic implants.
    Bagheri MH; Hosseini MM; Emami MJ; Foroughi AA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):584-90. PubMed ID: 21146947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Metallic stents: evaluation of MR imaging safety.
    Shellock FG; Shellock VJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Sep; 173(3):543-7. PubMed ID: 10470877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transperineal prostate biopsy under magnetic resonance image guidance: a needle placement accuracy study.
    Blumenfeld P; Hata N; DiMaio S; Zou K; Haker S; Fichtinger G; Tempany CM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):688-94. PubMed ID: 17729363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
    Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An MRI/US/x-ray compatible breast localization marker: in vivo evaluation.
    Li Y; Holloway CM; Purcell CM; Wang J; Plewes DB
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1557-66. PubMed ID: 16321745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valves in magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of potential hazards.
    Pruefer D; Kalden P; Schreiber W; Dahm M; Buerke M; Thelen M; Oelert H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 11380110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An MRI-compatible semiautomated vacuum-assisted breast biopsy system: initial feasibility study.
    Daniel BL; Freeman LJ; Pyzoha JM; McCoy TD; Birdwell RL; Bouley DM; Movius B; Hibner JA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 21(5):637-44. PubMed ID: 15834914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with an implantable loop recorder.
    Wong JA; Yee R; Gula LJ; Skanes AC; Ross IG; White JB; Klein GJ; Krahn AD
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 18307629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adjustable cerebrospinal fluid shunt valves in 3.0-Tesla MRI: a phantom study using explanted devices.
    Akbar M; Aschoff A; Georgi JC; Nennig E; Heiland S; Abel R; Stippich C
    Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 20563954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility of endoclips.
    Gill KR; Pooley RA; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Sep; 70(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 19555940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces.
    Shellock FG; Crues JV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):389-92. PubMed ID: 3260731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simultaneous ultrasound and MRI system for breast biopsy: compatibility assessment and demonstration in a dual modality phantom.
    Tang AM; Kacher DF; Lam EY; Wong KK; Jolesz FA; Yang ES
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Feb; 27(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 18334446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ossicular implants at 3 T.
    Shellock FG; Meepos LN; Stapleton MR; Valencerina S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):871-7. PubMed ID: 22643444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MR imaging of metallic implants and materials: a compilation of the literature.
    Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):811-4. PubMed ID: 3048071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Postimplantation MRI with cylindric and cubic intervertebral test implants: evaluation of implant shape, material, and volume in MRI artifacting--an in vitro study.
    Ernstberger T; Heidrich G; Buchhorn G
    Spine J; 2007; 7(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 17482121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.