1089 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15333766)
1. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP.
Park MS; Kim TK; Kim KW; Park SW; Lee JK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Kim KA; Kim AY; Kim PN; Lee MG; Ha HK
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):234-40. PubMed ID: 15333766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of infiltrative cholangiocarcinoma from benign common bile duct stricture using three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with MRCP.
Yu XR; Huang WY; Zhang BY; Li HQ; Geng DY
Clin Radiol; 2014 Jun; 69(6):567-73. PubMed ID: 24581958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic cytology in biliary strictures. Personal experience.
Geraci G; Pisello F; Arnone E; Modica G; Sciumè C
G Chir; 2008 Oct; 29(10):403-6. PubMed ID: 18947461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Lee MG; Lee HJ; Kim MH; Kang EM; Kim YH; Lee SG; Kim PN; Ha HK; Auh YH
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):663-9. PubMed ID: 9051013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique.
Vitellas KM; Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Nelson RC
Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):939-57; quiz 1107-8, 1112. PubMed ID: 10903685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): diagnostic usefulness].
Pamos S; Rivera P; Canelles P; Quiles F; Ortí E; Cuquerella J; Martínez V; Medina E
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Apr; 21(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 9633177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results.
DeWitt J; Misra VL; Leblanc JK; McHenry L; Sherman S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Sep; 64(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 16923477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malignant obstructive jaundice: comparison of MRCP and ERCP in the evaluation of distal lesions.
Di Cesare E; Puglielli E; Michelini O; Pistoi MA; Lombardi L; Rossi M; Barile A; Masciocchi C
Radiol Med; 2003; 105(5-6):445-53. PubMed ID: 12949455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer.
Chen WM; Wei KL; Chen YS; Chang PJ; Tung SY; Chang TS; Huang HC; Shen CH; Hsieh YY; Wu CS
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 14():140. PubMed ID: 27142076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of magnetic resonance in characterising extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.
Guarise A; Venturini S; Faccioli N; Pinali L; Morana G
Radiol Med; 2006 Jun; 111(4):526-38. PubMed ID: 16779539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monocentric study of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 239 patients with symptomatic biliary stricture.
Fior-Gozlan M; Giovannini D; Rabeyrin M; Mc Leer-Florin A; Laverrière MH; Bichard P
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 May; 124(5):330-9. PubMed ID: 26700399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings.
Yeh TS; Jan YY; Tseng JH; Chiu CT; Chen TC; Hwang TL; Chen MF
Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Feb; 95(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 10685746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and survival in cholangiocarcinoma: A prospective study.
Vasilieva L; Papadhimitriou SI; Alexopoulou A; Kostopoulos I; Papiris K; Pavlidis D; Xinopoulos D; Romanos A; Dourakis SP
Arab J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 17(4):181-184. PubMed ID: 27914884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnosis of biliary strictures in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, with special reference to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Lindberg B; Arnelo U; Bergquist A; Thörne A; Hjerpe A; Granqvist S; Hansson LO; Tribukait B; Persson B; Broomé U
Endoscopy; 2002 Nov; 34(11):909-16. PubMed ID: 12430077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging in the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma].
Zhou JX; Liang BL; Xu LY; Huang SQ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2004 Jul; 26(7):421-3. PubMed ID: 15355648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of MR cholangiopancreatography and surgical diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma].
Zhou J; Liang B; Huang S; Liu Q
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 24(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 11977650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of Factors Affecting the Sensitivity of Bile Duct Brush Cytology.
Kobayashi M; Ryozawa S; Araki R; Nagata K; Tanisaka Y; Fujita A; Kobatake T
Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 58(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 30146607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of EUS in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures and suspected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (with videos).
Khashab MA; Fockens P; Al-Haddad MA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Nov; 76(5):1024-33. PubMed ID: 22749367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease.
Varghese JC; Farrell MA; Courtney G; Osborne H; Murray FE; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 1999 Aug; 54(8):513-20. PubMed ID: 10484218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
